Procedural Justice in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

Tomlinson, Luke

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-17184-5

Cited by 24 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 72 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There are both intrinsic and instrumental reasons to allow the public to participate in making and implementing climate policy (Richardson, 1979;Few et al, 2007). The intrinsic values closely relate to democratic ideals and are independent of the outcome of the decision-making process (Tomlinson, 2015). All parties affected by a decision should autonomously be able to participate in the deliberation.…”

Section: Public Participation and E Cacymentioning

confidence: 99%

Yes we can? Effects of a participatory visioning process on perceived climate efficacy

Peisker

Schinko

2023

Front. Clim.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Lack of perceived efficacy can be an important barrier to climate mitigation action at various scales. Here, we study how a participatory visioning process, the Climate Modernity workshop in Styria, Austria, affected participants' efficacy outcomes. To this end, we conducted two survey waves eliciting self- and response efficacy regarding possible mitigation measures. We estimate difference-in-differences models and corroborate the findings using qualitative participant feedback. The results indicate that the intervention tended to decrease personal self-efficacy, in particular with regard to controversial topics like the transformation of the transport system. This suggests that participatory stakeholder processes can draw attention to the conflict potential and complexity of specific mitigation policies, decreasing the perceived feasibility of implementing them. The workshop, however, tended to increase particpants' personal response efficacy, particularly regarding voting for pro-environmental candidates. Accordingly, participatory processes could raise trust in the democratic process and in the effectiveness of making a green voting decision.

show abstract

Section: Public Participation and E Cacymentioning

confidence: 99%

Yes we can? Effects of a participatory visioning process on perceived climate efficacy

Peisker

Schinko

2023

Front. Clim.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…To understand the complexity of the issues at stake in SAdK's SES, it is necessary to reflect on the community, its actors and its ways of dealing with risks. How do network actors depend on modes of governance involved in risk and emergency management in a context where the occurrence of extreme weather events is exacerbated by CC (Aldunce et al, 2015;Burton et al, 2004)?…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Le réseau d’acteurs et ses représentations sociales : Méthode d’évaluation de la gestion des urgences et des risques à Saint-André de Kamouraska

Laroche,

Plante

2022

CJEM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, we evaluate emergency and risk management by combining social network analysis and the study of social representations. We use a classical, bipartite network analysis method to highlight the key actors in emergency and risk management. The use of social representations anchors our data in a particular territorial experience. Indeed, the proposed article is a case study of the municipality of Saint-André-de-Kamouraska located in the Bas-Saint-Laurent administrative region of Quebec. We argue that the main advantages of our method are: to reveal the key actors in emergency and risk management; to reveal the impact of these actors on the governance of emergencies and risks; to draw the socialization to risk and emergency of the studied population.

show abstract

“…So far, very little has been written on the topic by climate ethicists. 8 Against this background, this article outlines a theory of procedural climate justice to facilitate effective climate action under the Paris Agreement.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards a Theory of Pure Procedural Climate Justice

Brandstedt

Brülde

2019

J Applied Philosophy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A challenge for the theorising of climate justice is that even when the agents whose actions are supposed to be regulated are cooperative and act in good faith, they may still disagree about how the burdens and benefits of dealing with climate change should be distributed. This article is a contribution to the formulation of a useful role for normative theorising in light of this bounded nature of climate justice. We outline a theory of pure procedural climate justice; its content, function in relation to international climate diplomacy, and justification. The theory is 'pure' in the sense that it does not rely on an independent criterion of what are just outcomes in negotiations of climate responsibilities. Rather, it specifies procedural fairness norms, such as transparency, reciprocity and participation, which make the process of negotiation fair independently of which account of substantive climate justice happens to be correct. Such procedural fairness norms are justified in part by being expressions of an ideal of a reasonable negotiator, an ideal which itself commands respect. They are also justified as means to an effective coordinated response to dangerous climate change in virtue of their capacity to create trust, predictability and accountability.

show abstract

Procedural Justice in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

Cited by 24 publications

References 72 publications

Yes we can? Effects of a participatory visioning process on perceived climate efficacy

Yes we can? Effects of a participatory visioning process on perceived climate efficacy

Le réseau d’acteurs et ses représentations sociales : Méthode d’évaluation de la gestion des urgences et des risques à Saint-André de Kamouraska

Towards a Theory of Pure Procedural Climate Justice

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About