2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0748-5751(01)00021-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Procedural justice and the development and use of peer evaluations in business and accounting classes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kilpatrick revealed that procedural skills requires an understanding of several concepts and examples to enable students to use the procedure with different methods, and most important students know when the procedure are used [7]. Procedural skills is needed to support other mathematical skills, namely conceptual understanding [8]. Conceptual understanding and procedural skills are two different things but both support each other.…”
Section: Procedural Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kilpatrick revealed that procedural skills requires an understanding of several concepts and examples to enable students to use the procedure with different methods, and most important students know when the procedure are used [7]. Procedural skills is needed to support other mathematical skills, namely conceptual understanding [8]. Conceptual understanding and procedural skills are two different things but both support each other.…”
Section: Procedural Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results indicate that participation in both voluntary and mandatory supplemental instruction sessions was positively associated with total points earned in the course after controlling for self-selection bias and that performance increased in a step fashion with increased levels of participation in supplemental instruction. Kilpatrick, Linville, and Stout (2001) examined the use of peer evaluations in group-based learning within the framework of procedural justice theory, which refers to the perceived fairness of a system. The sample consisted of 669 students from three universities.…”
Section: Instructional Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Team activities can, however, present challenges to both students and instructors. In particular, students may perceive grading schemes that assign a single grade to the entire group as unfair because the grade does not account for the variable levels of effort and different contributions of individual team members 1,3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To a large degree, design of the rating instrument plays a big role in the reliability of the peer evaluations 1,8 as does training of students to provide useful evaluations of their peers 5 . Kilpatrick et al 3 specifically examined the characteristics of peer evaluation schemes that encouraged business students to perceive the peer evaluation process as being fair. Among other results, Kilpatrick et al 3 found that students:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation