2002
DOI: 10.1111/1540-5826.00032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Procedural Facilitators and Cognitive Strategies: Tools for Unraveling the Mysteries of Comprehension and the Writing Process, and for Providing Meaningful Access to the General Curriculum

Abstract: A solid, emerging research base exists to inform how we provide meaningful access to the general education curriculum for students with learning disabilities (LD). For example, the presentation of challenging content to academically diverse learners can be demystified using content enhancement techniques. Additionally, a range of strategies can be taught to enhance reading comprehension and expressive writing abilities. Examples from several lines of research in comprehension and writing are used to highlight … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0
9

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
64
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, they fail to identify higher-order errors such as organisational problems or issues of content. Their revision process mainly involves proofreading and resembles a sort of ''housecleaning task'' (Baker, Gersten, & Scanlon, 2002). Furthermore, less competent revisers have fewer advanced revision strategies at their command (Faigley & Witte, 1981;Sommers, 1980).…”
Section: Training In Peer Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, they fail to identify higher-order errors such as organisational problems or issues of content. Their revision process mainly involves proofreading and resembles a sort of ''housecleaning task'' (Baker, Gersten, & Scanlon, 2002). Furthermore, less competent revisers have fewer advanced revision strategies at their command (Faigley & Witte, 1981;Sommers, 1980).…”
Section: Training In Peer Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in part because for many students with disabilities, particularly students wirh learning disabilities, the focus of the special education services provided has, historically, been to ensure student progress in core content areas. As such, there are not studies that speak exphcitly to the degree to which students with learning disabilities are "involved with" the general education curriculum; many studies describe instructional methods and curriculum adaptations and augmentationsshadowing, verbatim notes, graphic or advance organizers, self-regulation strategies, semantic maps, mnemonics, chunking, questioning, and visualizing strategies-to promote progress in core content areas for students with learning disabilities (Baker, Gersten, & Scanlon, 2002;Graham & Harris, 2005;Jitendra, Edwards, Choutka, & Treadway, 2002;Pressley, 2005). modifications such as augmentations (e.g., teaching students cognitive strategies) are used, student engagement and progress improves (De La Paz & MacArthur, 2003).…”
Section: Practitioners Often Interpret Promoting "Access To Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Οι δυσκολίες στην ανάγνωση και τον γραπτό λόγο έ-χουν σημαντικές επιπτώσεις στην ακαδημαϊκή επίδοση των παιδιών στις τελευταίες τάξεις του δημοτικού σχολείου και στο γυμνάσιο, όπου το αναλυτικό πρόγραμμα του σχολείου βασίζεται κυρίως στη διδασκαλία μέσω της χρήσης γραπτών κειμένων (Baker, Gersten, & Scanlon, 2002).…”
Section: δεξιότητες γραμματισμού και ψυχοκοινωνική προσαρμογήunclassified