2015
DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2015-0061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Procalcitonin-guided antibiotic therapy: a potentially effective and efficient strategy

Abstract: Comment on\ud \ud Economic evaluation of procalcitonin-guided antibiotic therapy in acute respiratory infections: a US health system perspective. [Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of this research has concluded that IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and CRP are non-specific in separating SIRS due to infection from non-infectious SIRS. However, procalcitonin levels are only mildly elevated in SIRS but become significantly elevated in sepsis and dramatically elevated with Gram-negative sepsis [ 10 , 11 ]. This finding, although initially reported by Assicot back in 1993, continued to mostly be under-utilized in the care of septic patients until recently, when the research in this area has greatly improved [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of this research has concluded that IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and CRP are non-specific in separating SIRS due to infection from non-infectious SIRS. However, procalcitonin levels are only mildly elevated in SIRS but become significantly elevated in sepsis and dramatically elevated with Gram-negative sepsis [ 10 , 11 ]. This finding, although initially reported by Assicot back in 1993, continued to mostly be under-utilized in the care of septic patients until recently, when the research in this area has greatly improved [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its measurement is widely available, eliminating the need for a highly specialised hospital laboratory. Moreover, laboratory sets for PCT are also more readily standardised, and results from different laboratories are easier to compare when contrasted with Ct because all available sets use the same antibodies, which lends itself to a higher level of performing measurements [14,16]. Finally, the results of PCT measurements are more readily available because it is an examination usually performed in urgent conditions, whereas the waiting period for the results of a Ct measurement is PRACE ORYGINALNE substantially longer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This feature of ProCT differs clearly from CT and has high relevance in clinical practice. Some limitations, however, affect ProCT determination; in fact, a marked increase in this molecule has been reported in systemic infections (mainly bacteriemia) and inflammatory diseases, and these conditions represent the main indications for ProCT measurement (Plebani & Fabbri 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A relevant advantage of using ProCT assays is that all commercial assays yield quite similar results. One limitation might be that measurements of ProCT are not very widely available; however, because of its increasing use as a pivotal marker in internal medicine and antibiotic therapy, the availability of ProCT is expected to grow during the coming years (Plebani & Fabbri 2015). The most critical challenge is that further studies are needed to identify the optimal cutoff level of ProCT, so that active (i.e., recurrent/persistent) MTC cases can be distinguished from cured ones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%