2012
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Procalcitonin and procalcitonin kinetics for diagnosis and prognosis of intravascular catheter-related bloodstream infections in selected critically ill patients: a prospective observational study

Abstract: BackgroundProcalcitonin (PCT) has emerged as a valuable marker of sepsis. The potential role of PCT in diagnosis and therapy monitoring of intravascular catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) in intensive care unit (ICU) is still unclear and was evaluated.MethodsForty-six patients were included in the study, provided they were free of infection upon admission and presented the first episode of suspected CRBSI during their ICU stay. Patients who had developed any other infection were excluded. PCT was … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the ROC analysis showed an AUC for the PCT level of 0.80, suggesting that the PCT test had moderate accuracy (according to the classification of Akobeng (13)) for diagnosing sepsis. This finding is consistent with the observations of previous reports suggesting that the PCT level is superior to the endotoxin, interleukin (IL)-6 and CRP levels as a biomarker for the diagnosis of sepsis (5,8,(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19). In addition to the confirmation study, the present study provides novel evidence that: 1) the serum PTC level is a superior marker of sepsis, but not local infections, such as pneumonia, and 2) serum PCT elevation is more closely associated with GNR infection than GPC infection in patients with sepsis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the ROC analysis showed an AUC for the PCT level of 0.80, suggesting that the PCT test had moderate accuracy (according to the classification of Akobeng (13)) for diagnosing sepsis. This finding is consistent with the observations of previous reports suggesting that the PCT level is superior to the endotoxin, interleukin (IL)-6 and CRP levels as a biomarker for the diagnosis of sepsis (5,8,(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19). In addition to the confirmation study, the present study provides novel evidence that: 1) the serum PTC level is a superior marker of sepsis, but not local infections, such as pneumonia, and 2) serum PCT elevation is more closely associated with GNR infection than GPC infection in patients with sepsis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Furthermore, in the context of local bacterial or viral infection, the circulating PCT level remains at <1.6 ng/mL (4). Other studies have suggested that measuring the PCT level is useful for making an early diagnosis of sepsis (5), as well as assessing the severity (6) and prognosis (7,8) of septic patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical relevance of changes in the markers is less clear, however. Changes in CRP and PCT over 2–7 days have been described in non-critically ill patient populations [13][20], in relatively small studies, about 50 patients or less [4], [9], [13], [15], [16], [19], [21][25], in specific conditions [2], [8], [10], [13], [15][17], [19], [20], [22], [24], [26][29] or in heterogeneous conditions in the ICU [4][7], [9], [11], [21], [23], [30][32], to judge the course of infection and its sequelae. CRP decreases of more than about 25% per day within the first week of treatment of (bloodstream) infections or sepsis have been suggested to help predict a beneficial response and disease course, while slower decreases or increases have been associated with persistent infection, organ failure or mortality, also in the ICU [7,8,11,17–19,21-,23,26–29,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inappropriate treatment is potentially harmful because of the emergence of resistant pathogens, supra-infections, and unnecessary costs [3]. Unfortunately, diagnosis is often complicated by symptoms such as fever, chills and hypotension, which are non-specific [4]. The Infectious Disease Society of America recommended against routine screening for, and antimicrobial treatment of, asymptomatic bacteriuria in elderly, whether community dwellers or institutionalized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%