Advances in Liquid Crystal Research and Applications 1981
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-026191-1.50050-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problems of the photographic documentation of liquid crystalline thermographs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the illumination and viewing are on the same line (on-axis), the angle effect was minimized, amounting to a measurement error of only a few percent of the effective hue range for angles 0 to 70°, while off-axis light and viewing can result in much higher errors. 24,14,23,25,26…”
Section: Illumination and Viewing Incidence Anglesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the illumination and viewing are on the same line (on-axis), the angle effect was minimized, amounting to a measurement error of only a few percent of the effective hue range for angles 0 to 70°, while off-axis light and viewing can result in much higher errors. 24,14,23,25,26…”
Section: Illumination and Viewing Incidence Anglesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cahbration of the TLC was performed using the spectral peaks of light intensity for each of the three observed colon. A diffuse-light source was mounted on the camera to eliminate the view-angle dependency of the TLC color transition discussed by Herold and Wiegel (1980). TLC was calibrated with a coupon at the representative view angle at the beginning of each test.…”
Section: Fig 10 Schematic View Of Test Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They used (1) a fibre optic ring light which was coaxially mounted to the camera lens (on-axis) and calibrated the TLCs for angles (measured from the surface normal) between 10 and 25 ° and (2) positioned the camera normal to the TLC-coated surface and varied the illumination angle (off-axis) between 15 and 35 ° . The authors showed that the change of the hue values is negligible for the on-axis arrangement if the illumination and viewing angle are changed in the same way (see also Herold and Wiegel [16]). Further they showed that the hue values change to higher values for on-axis off-axis the off-axis arrangement with increasing illumination angle (the camera was fixed with its optical axis normal to the TLC-coated surface) which corresponds to a change to shorter dominant wavelengths (over 10% for a change of the illumination angle between 15 and 35°).…”
Section: Comparison Of Tlc Sheet Versus Tlc Inkmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This effect is confirmed by Farina et al [15] who showed that an angle between camera and light source of 35 ° (light source fixed normal to the surface) can cause a change of hue of about 14% (to shorter wavelengths) as compared to a 0°-configuration. Based on a study of Herold and Wiegel [16], Farina et al show that a position of a light source fixed coaxially to the camera axis avoids any angle dependence. They attached a fibre optic ring light coaxially to the camera lens and changed the angle of both camera and light source measured from the normal of the TLC-coated surface between 0 and 25 ° without any significant effect on the hue values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%