1975
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0034660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problems of postsynaptic autogenous and recurrent inhibition in the mammalian spinal cord

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

1976
1976
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 218 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among other things it has been proposed that it constitutes a mechanism for lateral inhibition in the motor nuclei (Haase, Cleveland & Ross, 1975), that it is a stabilizing negative feed-back system, or that it operates as a switch for the activity in agonistic and antagonistic muscles (Wand & Pompeiano, 1979). Hultborn, Lindstrom & Wigstr6m (1979) drew attention to the fact that all these hypotheses were narrowly focused onto a-motoneurones and could hardly serve as general explanations of the functional significance of recurrent inhibition in the motor ' output stage'.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among other things it has been proposed that it constitutes a mechanism for lateral inhibition in the motor nuclei (Haase, Cleveland & Ross, 1975), that it is a stabilizing negative feed-back system, or that it operates as a switch for the activity in agonistic and antagonistic muscles (Wand & Pompeiano, 1979). Hultborn, Lindstrom & Wigstr6m (1979) drew attention to the fact that all these hypotheses were narrowly focused onto a-motoneurones and could hardly serve as general explanations of the functional significance of recurrent inhibition in the motor ' output stage'.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the excitatory inputs due to the voluntary motor discharge reaching Renshaw cells via motor axon collaterals, data from animal experiments suggest that inhibitory synaptic inputs might converge on Renshaw cells during voluntary contractions. These inhibitory influences can be elicited both from supraspinal centres and/or segmentally from various receptors in the limb involved in soleus contraction (for references, see Haase et al 1975). In relation to the present experiments, the results obtained by Koehler, Windhorst, Schmidt, Meyer-Lohmann & H. HULTBORN AND E. PIERROT-DESEILLIGNY Henatsch (1978) are of particular interest, since they have shown that stimulation of the capsula interna often produced an increase of the monosynaptic reflex together with a decrease of the resulting Renshaw cell activity, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Renshaw cells also receive synaptic inputs from other sources than motor axon collaterals. Inhibitory or excitatory effects, which are not secondary to changes in the motoneuronal discharge, can be elicited both from segmental reflex pathways and descending tracts (for references see Haase, Cleveland & Ross, 1975;Fromm, Haase & Wolf, 1977;Koehler, Windhorst, Schmidt, Meyer-Lohmann & Henatsch, 1978). The question then arises whether these control systems converging on Renshaw cells merely cause a parallel shift in the relation between the input from motor axon collaterals and the amount of recurrent inhibition or if it also modifies the slope of this relation, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%