1995
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-79721-7_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problems of Gravimeter Calibration in High Precision Gravimetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several authors (e.g. [11,12]) have reported abnormal reaction to atmospheric pressure variations in some LaCoste & Romberg (LR) gravimeters due to inefficiency of the meter sealing or loss of vacuum over time. All the aforementioned instrumental troubles (drift, tares, setup errors, and sealing leaks) strongly limit the repeatability of the gravity measurements carried out with spring sensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors (e.g. [11,12]) have reported abnormal reaction to atmospheric pressure variations in some LaCoste & Romberg (LR) gravimeters due to inefficiency of the meter sealing or loss of vacuum over time. All the aforementioned instrumental troubles (drift, tares, setup errors, and sealing leaks) strongly limit the repeatability of the gravity measurements carried out with spring sensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mass correction. The gravitational effect of the topographic masses was calculated by applying an extremely accurate correction method: in the immediate vicinity of the stations (distance < 1200 m) the topography was approximated by bodies of arbitrary shape (polyhedral) [33], instead of flat-topped prisms. Considering the Earth's curvature, all mass corrections were calculated in a spherical approximation with a radius of 167 km, assuming a density of 2670 kgm −3 , a value very close to the density of the surface rocks of the investigated area.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%