2019
DOI: 10.31901/24566764.2019/10.04.330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problems of Education in the Third State Duma, as a Reflection of the Spiritual Condition of Society

Abstract: Despite being a country of various blue stockings, Indian daughters particularly from the countryside and lower socioeconomic hierarchy have remained the victims of unfairness in learning opportunities from ancient to modern time. The present research work tries to examine the regional progress and inequality in education and determinants of lower educational prospects of girls in India on the basis of secondary data. Here, the disparity index and correlation coefficient are applied to analyze the gender discr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A characteristic feature of Soviet historiography was a negative interpretation of the tsarist government's measures in the field of schooling for non-Russian peoples, while at the same time emphasizing the progressive influence of Russian culture on them (BERKUTOV, 1968;DNIEPROV, 1985;EFIROV, 1939;GOROKHOV, 1941;KHAKIMOV, 1972;KHANBIKOV, 1967;MAKHMUTOVA, 1982;RUSTYAMOVA, 1958). After the collapse of the USSR, as interest in national history soared, historians wrote about different aspects of the state school policy towards Tatars-Muslims (FARKHSHATOV, 2000;FAZLIEV et al, 2019;GAFAROV, 2019;MAKHMUTOVA, 1998;RAKHIMOV, 1997;ZAGIDULLIN, 1992). There was an increase in the number of studies on the history of Tatar madrasas and the social and pedagogical activity of national education reformers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A characteristic feature of Soviet historiography was a negative interpretation of the tsarist government's measures in the field of schooling for non-Russian peoples, while at the same time emphasizing the progressive influence of Russian culture on them (BERKUTOV, 1968;DNIEPROV, 1985;EFIROV, 1939;GOROKHOV, 1941;KHAKIMOV, 1972;KHANBIKOV, 1967;MAKHMUTOVA, 1982;RUSTYAMOVA, 1958). After the collapse of the USSR, as interest in national history soared, historians wrote about different aspects of the state school policy towards Tatars-Muslims (FARKHSHATOV, 2000;FAZLIEV et al, 2019;GAFAROV, 2019;MAKHMUTOVA, 1998;RAKHIMOV, 1997;ZAGIDULLIN, 1992). There was an increase in the number of studies on the history of Tatar madrasas and the social and pedagogical activity of national education reformers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%