“…The energy and power densities of devices are largely dependent on the choice of the current collector, even when the same active materials are used. − In particular, electrodes fabricated with interpenetrating three-dimensional (3D) ion and electron transport pathways have been proven to exhibit charge-transport properties superior to those of their planar counterparts. − These electrodes are prepared through the deposition of the active layer onto suitable current collectors with stereoscopic 3D surface structures (henceforth, “3D current collectors”), such as copper pillar arrays, nickel foams, − stainless steel meshes, , polymer scaffolds, − carbonaceous materials, , and nanoporous gold. − Alternatively, gold-nanowire current collectors can provide superior performance in combination with active materials such as carbon nanotubes and manganese dioxides. , Nevertheless, the charge capacity per unit mass of the active material often decreases with an increase in the loading of the active material. , This adverse effect is most likely related to the increased charge-transport path length on thickening of the active layer. To circumvent this limitation, 3D current collectors should be engineered in such a way as to increase their volumes and surface areas, i.e., the height and roughness factor (RF), so that they can be coated with large amounts of thinner active layers.…”