2002
DOI: 10.1054/jcms.2002.0304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problems, obstacles and complications with transpalatal distraction in non-congenital deformities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0
8

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
53
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…dISCuSSIoN RME promotes an increase in transverse dimensions and in the perimeter of the upper dental arch with a real gain of bone at the level of midpalatal suture. 10,11 In the present case, intercanine expansion of 11 mm with intermolar expansion Complications that are related to the expansion appliance include its impingement on palatal soft tissue, loosening (more common with bone-borne distractors 12 ), and breakage and stripping or locking of the appliance screw. [13][14][15] Bonded acrylic RME appliance was recommended in cases of constricted maxilla where inferior and anterior movements of maxilla were restricted.…”
Section: Appliance Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…dISCuSSIoN RME promotes an increase in transverse dimensions and in the perimeter of the upper dental arch with a real gain of bone at the level of midpalatal suture. 10,11 In the present case, intercanine expansion of 11 mm with intermolar expansion Complications that are related to the expansion appliance include its impingement on palatal soft tissue, loosening (more common with bone-borne distractors 12 ), and breakage and stripping or locking of the appliance screw. [13][14][15] Bonded acrylic RME appliance was recommended in cases of constricted maxilla where inferior and anterior movements of maxilla were restricted.…”
Section: Appliance Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In the case of overloading or premature loading, the metal-bone interface fails and the screws become loose. Loose or dislodged devices have been mentioned in clinical studies (Neyt et al, 2002) and in experimental studies (Gefen, 2002;Schulten et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By LFI-DO-bone rigid PDD, using a bone-borne distractor devices, it's possible to avoid the problems related to the use of a non-rigid device like asymmetric maxillary expansion (Koudstaal, 2009(Koudstaal, , 2010(Koudstaal, , 2011, device components detachment with swallowing risks (Neyt et al, 2002).…”
Section: Problems and Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%