1984
DOI: 10.1080/13632758408454839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problems involved in correlating changes of functional diffusive and anatomical surface areas of the upper and lower chicken small intestine during fasting

Abstract: The anatomic villous surface area and the functional diffusive area (measured by the absorption of 64 mM thiourea) of the jejunum and ileum was estimated in fed and 3-d-fasted chickens. In the jejunum, fasting caused a 50% reduction of the anatomic villous surface area but only a 32% reduction in the functional diffusive area. The jejunal permeability to thiourea was unaltered. The ileal anatomic villous surface area was unaffected by fasting but the ileal functional diffusive area was decreased significantly … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present results of villus development, expressed as villus amplification factor, suggest significant regional differences during the period considered; the duodenum shows a peak in the third week of age (66% increase with respect to 1-day-old animals), after which it remains unchanged; the jejunum shows a progressive increase, and in the ileum this variable shows few changes. The regional comparison of VAF results agrees with the distal reduction previously described for mammalian species (Wood 1944;Pénzes and Skála 1977;Stenling and Helander 1981;Ecknauer et al 1982;Holt et al 1984;Karasov et al 1986;Thomson 1986;Gardner and Steele 1989) and confirms the data of Levin and Mitchell (1984), who have described for the chicken intestine higher values of villus surface in the jejunum than in the ileum. Smith et al (1990) have attributed the smaller development of ileal villus to the lowest luminal concentration of nutrients that reach this intestinal segment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The present results of villus development, expressed as villus amplification factor, suggest significant regional differences during the period considered; the duodenum shows a peak in the third week of age (66% increase with respect to 1-day-old animals), after which it remains unchanged; the jejunum shows a progressive increase, and in the ileum this variable shows few changes. The regional comparison of VAF results agrees with the distal reduction previously described for mammalian species (Wood 1944;Pénzes and Skála 1977;Stenling and Helander 1981;Ecknauer et al 1982;Holt et al 1984;Karasov et al 1986;Thomson 1986;Gardner and Steele 1989) and confirms the data of Levin and Mitchell (1984), who have described for the chicken intestine higher values of villus surface in the jejunum than in the ileum. Smith et al (1990) have attributed the smaller development of ileal villus to the lowest luminal concentration of nutrients that reach this intestinal segment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Increased IP has been observed in association with increased villus height and crypt depth in pigs (Yeruva et al., ), decreased villus height and crypt depth in pigs (Spreeuwenberg, Verdonk, Gaskins, & Verstegen, ) and unaltered intestinal morphology in rats (Hodin et al., ) and humans (Hernandez et al., ). Furthermore, reduced villus area in the jejunum was not correlated with thio‐urea absorption after 3 days of fasting in chickens (Levin & Mitchell, ). This suggests that intestinal morphology may not have a direct influence on IP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vitro histologic studies have not demonstrated any change in surface area when the bowel is passively distended (39,40). In vivo, the problems in quantitating surface area has been the subject of extensive discussion (41)(42)(43). Functional chemical markers of absorptive surface area (urea, 3H20, xylose) (7,44) have been used in many perfusion studies, but problems with these markers question their reliability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%