1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1234-988x(199612)6:4<243::aid-mpr167>3.3.co;2-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problems in Measuring Problem‐solving: The Suitability of the Means – Ends Problem Solving (Meps) Procedure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MEPS has already been found to be a reasonable and robust instrument (D'Zurilla & Maydeu-Olivares, 1995;House & Scott, 1996), and this study has shown that the revised problem solving scenarios were acceptable for use with older adults. The MEPS measures performance on 'means end thinking' tasks, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The MEPS has already been found to be a reasonable and robust instrument (D'Zurilla & Maydeu-Olivares, 1995;House & Scott, 1996), and this study has shown that the revised problem solving scenarios were acceptable for use with older adults. The MEPS measures performance on 'means end thinking' tasks, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…However, the MEPS has never been validated for use with older adults, and it has several limitations. First, respondents are instructed to 'make up a story' that may potentially introduce a lack of realism and cause an atypical problem solving set to be adopted (House & Scott, 1996). Second, respondents are instructed to identify with a protagonist that possibly reduces the personal relevance and therefore the ecological validity of the measure (D'Zurilla & Maydeu-Olivares, 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various amendments to the original have been proposed. In order to improve the consistency of administration of the MEPS, Butler and Meichenbaum (1981) suggested excluding some of the less relevant scenarios, whilst House and Scott (1996) recommend that participants are asked to provide their ideal solution, rather than simply to 'complete the story'. In the present study both of these variations were adopted.…”
Section: Mean Ends Problem Solving Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, it is important to note that although the MEPS procedure has been widely used as a measure of problem‐solving ability, House and Scott () point out several criticisms of the test. For instance, because MEPS scenarios are interpersonal in nature, they require an interaction or a behavioral response from the protagonist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%