1959
DOI: 10.1176/ajp.116.4.356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problems in Evaluation of R-1625

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1961
1961
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The P value refers only 10 the 4 cases that had saline controls. 16 If the groups are compared only on the basis of those in whom crossover controls were possible (TABLE 3), it will be noted that the administration of thioperazine followed by mescaline was not associated with any significant fall of the ninhydrin positive substances when compared statistically to the thioperazine-saline controls. At 4 hours, the thioperazine-mescaline group (4 cases with crossover controls) showed a 23.6 per cent fall of the ninhydrin positive substances from the base line, while the thioperazine-saline group had fallen only 16.4 per cent at the same time.…”
Section: Annals New York Academy Of Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The P value refers only 10 the 4 cases that had saline controls. 16 If the groups are compared only on the basis of those in whom crossover controls were possible (TABLE 3), it will be noted that the administration of thioperazine followed by mescaline was not associated with any significant fall of the ninhydrin positive substances when compared statistically to the thioperazine-saline controls. At 4 hours, the thioperazine-mescaline group (4 cases with crossover controls) showed a 23.6 per cent fall of the ninhydrin positive substances from the base line, while the thioperazine-saline group had fallen only 16.4 per cent at the same time.…”
Section: Annals New York Academy Of Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%