1953
DOI: 10.2307/2306485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problems for Solution: 4518-4522

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. For k = 0, 1 it follows from a general result by Erdős and Straus [3], that S k is irrational, whereas for k = 2 the same was shown by Erdős and Kac [2]. In [1], Erdős posed the question whether S k is irrational for all k. We will prove the following theorem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…. For k = 0, 1 it follows from a general result by Erdős and Straus [3], that S k is irrational, whereas for k = 2 the same was shown by Erdős and Kac [2]. In [1], Erdős posed the question whether S k is irrational for all k. We will prove the following theorem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…This was proved by J.B. Kelly [2] and R. Breusch [3] respectively for k = 1 and 2. The irrationality for k = 3 was established independently by Schlage-Puchta [8] and by Friedlander, Luca and Stoiciu [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…For k 1 let σ k (n) denote the sum of the k-th powers of the positive divisors of n. In 1953 Erdős and Kac [3], [5,Problem 14] conjectured that the sum…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%