“…It was shown in [4,11] that the n−weak amenability of A ′′ implies the n−weak amenability of A. In [13] it was shown that if the Banach algebra A is complete Arens regular and every derivation D : A → A ′ is weakly compact, the weak amenability of A (2n) for some n ≥ 1 implies of A. The authors in [5,10] determined the conditions that the 3−weak amenability of A ′′ implies the 3−weak amenability of A, and the 3−weak amenability of A (2n) for some (n ≥ 1) implies the 3−weak amenability of A.…”
Let A be a Banach algebra such that its (2n)−th dual for some(n ≥ 1) with first Arens product is m−weakly amenable for some (m > 2n).We introduce some conditions by which if m is odd [even], then A is weakly [2-weakly] amenable.
“…It was shown in [4,11] that the n−weak amenability of A ′′ implies the n−weak amenability of A. In [13] it was shown that if the Banach algebra A is complete Arens regular and every derivation D : A → A ′ is weakly compact, the weak amenability of A (2n) for some n ≥ 1 implies of A. The authors in [5,10] determined the conditions that the 3−weak amenability of A ′′ implies the 3−weak amenability of A, and the 3−weak amenability of A (2n) for some (n ≥ 1) implies the 3−weak amenability of A.…”
Let A be a Banach algebra such that its (2n)−th dual for some(n ≥ 1) with first Arens product is m−weakly amenable for some (m > 2n).We introduce some conditions by which if m is odd [even], then A is weakly [2-weakly] amenable.
“…under the usual matrix operations and l 1 -norm, where A and B are Banach algebras and M is a Banach (A, B)-bimodule. In [16], it is proven that if M 0, then Tri(A, M, B) is not amenable, and hence if M = 0 then Tri(A, M, B) is amenable if and only if A and B are amenable. Let K = 0 M 0 0 , then K is a closed ideal in Tri(A, M, B) and Tri(A, M, B)/K A ⊕ B (isometric isomorphism).…”
Let A be a Banach algebra and I be a closed ideal of A. We say that A is
amenable relative to I, if A/I is an amenable Banach algebra. We study the
relative amenability of Banach algebras and investigate the relative
amenability of triangular Banach algebras and Banach algebras associated to
locally compact groups. We generalize some of the previous known results by
applying the concept of relative amenability of Banach algebras, especially,
we present a generalization of Johnson?s theorem in the concept of relative
amenability.
“…under the usual matrix operations and l 1 -norm, where A and B are Banach algebras and M is a Banach (A, B)-bimodule. In [16], it is proven that if M = 0, then T ri(A, M, B) is not amenable, and hence if M = 0 then T ri(A, M, B) is amenable if and only if A and B are amenable. Let K = 0 M 0 0 , then K is a closed ideal in T ri(A, M, B) and T ri(A, M, B)/K ∼ = A ⊕ B (isometric isomorphism).…”
Let A be a Banach algebra and I be a closed ideal of A. We say that A is amenable relative to I, if A/I is an amenable Banach algebra. We study the relative amenability of Banach algebras and investigate the relative amenability of triangular Banach algebras and Banach algebras associated to locally compact groups. We generalize some of the previous known results by applying the concept of relative amenability of Banach algebras, especially, we present a generalization of Johnson's theorem in the concept of relative amenability.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.