2005
DOI: 10.3200/ctch.53.2.57-61
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problems Associated With Evaluating Student Performance In Groups

Abstract: Using small groups in student cooperative learning enterprises has become a major trend in American higher education (Cheng and Warren 2000). However, several practical issues involving the assessment of an individual's performance in groups have sometimes created resistance to the method from both students and parents (Kagan 1995). This article evaluates the case for using cooperative group assignments and the problems associated with evaluating the performances of individuals working in groups. Practical sug… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Instructors play a role in monitoring team performance and providing assistance and feedback to assess students’ interpersonal and team skills (Choi & Ro, 2012; Johnson & Johnson, 1999). As part of this monitoring role, it seems plausible for educators to collaborate with students through facilitation (contributing structure and resources) and mentoring (supplying instructions and suggestions; King & Behnke, 2005; Tideswell, 2005). Supporting this idea, Coker and Davies (2006) state that there is no replacement for hands-on training before a project commences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instructors play a role in monitoring team performance and providing assistance and feedback to assess students’ interpersonal and team skills (Choi & Ro, 2012; Johnson & Johnson, 1999). As part of this monitoring role, it seems plausible for educators to collaborate with students through facilitation (contributing structure and resources) and mentoring (supplying instructions and suggestions; King & Behnke, 2005; Tideswell, 2005). Supporting this idea, Coker and Davies (2006) state that there is no replacement for hands-on training before a project commences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The less frequent use of group project for collaborative learning probably has something to do with its relative unpopularity among students (King & Behnke, 2005;Pfaff & Huddleston, 2003) and instructors' tendency to play along. Besides typical issues in group work such as social loafing, personality dominance, and member conflict, students collaborating online need to deal with additional difficulties in coordinating group activities due to time zone difference, and in some cases, even cultural difference (Liu, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These goals can be accomplished by charting out exercises and facilitating lively classroom discussions throughout the semester. Second, whereas literature shows that group projects can yield mixed results in terms of learning outcomes, the majority of research favors the idea of creating a realistic "business-like" environment in the classroom, which projects provide (King & Behnke, 2005). By introducing an analogy of a firm with its employee teams to a classroom with its student groups, this article contends that help seeking is an important variable to establish group cohesion.…”
Section: Pedagogical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%