2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-012-9354-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problems associated with direct displacement-based design of concrete bridges with single-column piers, and some suggested improvements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, Kappos et al (2012aKappos et al ( , 2013 have extended the DDBD procedure to properly include higher mode effects and also added additional design criteria (see Sect. 7.3.1).…”
Section: Overview Of Pbd Methods For Bridgesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More recently, Kappos et al (2012aKappos et al ( , 2013 have extended the DDBD procedure to properly include higher mode effects and also added additional design criteria (see Sect. 7.3.1).…”
Section: Overview Of Pbd Methods For Bridgesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, elastic rotations (θ el ) are related to the corresponding inelastic ones (θ inel ), using an empirical procedure (like (Kappos et al 2012a)); use of empirical factors to estimate θ inel is an inherent limitation of the proposed procedure, since otherwise ductility factors cannot be estimated at this stage. Referring to Fig.…”
Section: Description Of the Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(a) (b) To define the secant stiffness of the case studies, the moment of inertia reduction factors, α b for beams and α c for first-story columns, of the reference frames need to be assumed. Kowalsky [43] and Kappos et al [44] adopted 10 percent of the uncracked section stiffness to represent the secant stiffness of RC bridge piers as a start for their iterative design methods. Cheng [34] determined the member stiffness matrix with plastic hinges at one or both ends.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…two explicitly and two implicitly considered) within a single application of the method; clearly, one can run MDDBD for different PLs (i.e. multiple applications of the method) but this would require at least double the computational effort, if at all feasible due to limitations related to low and moderated seismic hazard levels (Kappos et al 2012).…”
Section: Comparison Of Def-bd With Mddbdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of the latter methodology (hereafter referred to as MDDBD) regarding the adopted design assumptions (i.e. response spectrum analysis, displacement spectrum, secant stiffness at yield, controlled parameters) and identified limitations can be found elsewhere (Kappos et al 2012(Kappos et al , 2013, along with its implementation to the same bridge considering a single PL (i.e. 'life-safety').…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%