2006
DOI: 10.1080/02634930701210575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problems and trends in education in Central Asia since 1990: the case of general secondary education in Kyrgyzstan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the USSR era, teachers employed top-down, authoritarian teaching methods that did not encourage critical thinking, multiple sources of information or open discussion in classrooms (Burkhalter and Shegebayev, 2012;DeYoung, 2006). Education, to some extent, was seen as similar to propaganda, and teachers' main duties were to breed unique perceptions, manipulate cognitions, nurture understanding and mould behaviour towards a specific ideology and beliefs related to a centrally planned economy (DeYoung, 2006;Zogla, 2006). After the collapse of the USSR, although educational systems went through a period of transition, most teachers continued to adhere to the same philosophies with regard to teaching methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the USSR era, teachers employed top-down, authoritarian teaching methods that did not encourage critical thinking, multiple sources of information or open discussion in classrooms (Burkhalter and Shegebayev, 2012;DeYoung, 2006). Education, to some extent, was seen as similar to propaganda, and teachers' main duties were to breed unique perceptions, manipulate cognitions, nurture understanding and mould behaviour towards a specific ideology and beliefs related to a centrally planned economy (DeYoung, 2006;Zogla, 2006). After the collapse of the USSR, although educational systems went through a period of transition, most teachers continued to adhere to the same philosophies with regard to teaching methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideas about educational practice that have been developed over generations in «cultures with very different basic values» are not easily imported, nor are they simply and immediately taken up by professional educators who have developed and used their own distinctive repertoire of teaching strategies (Elliott & Tudge 2007: 107) [61]. The process is more akin to «acclimatization,» as proposed changes in educational policies and practices are shaped by changes in the broader national context and interpreted by teachers through current and previous norms and tried, evaluated and adjusted and in some cases abandoned (see for example DeYoung, 2005) [62].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the high level of commitment, there was no particular success in the practical implementation of the approach in Kazakhstan for a number of reasons. First, teacher training in the country is greatly based on the old Soviet curriculum that emphasizes more traditional teacher-centered instruction and that is typically delivered by authoritarian teachers trained in the same tradition [Burkhalter, Shegebayev, 2012;Burkhalter, 2013;DeYoung, 2006;Long, Long, 1999]. Second, in-service teacher training in post-Soviet Central Asia is chronically underfunded, provides few regular or equal opportunities for teachers' development, and resembles a patchwork of workshops, seminars, and courses, which update subject knowledge rather than teach skills [DeYoung, 2006].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%