Turbulence and Magnetic Fields in Astrophysics
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-36238-x_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problems and Progress in Astrophysical Dynamos

Abstract: Abstract. Astrophysical objects with negligible resistivity are often threaded by large scale magnetic fields. The generation of these fields is somewhat mysterious, since a magnetic field in a perfectly conducting fluid cannot change the flux threading a fluid element, or the field topology. Classical dynamo theory evades this limit by assuming that magnetic reconnection is fast, even for vanishing resistivity, and that the large scale field can be generated by the action of kinetic helicity. Both these claim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, one can in principle suspect that amplification of the magnetic energy flux along the low-power jets between the subparsec and kiloparsec scales is required by the data, in agreement with the more detailed analysis of M87 . We note that amplification of a mean magnetic energy flux is indeed expected in any conductive plasma containing nonvanishing helicity of turbulent motions or a strong velocity shear, although the general applicability of the simple kinematic dynamo theory-usually considered in this context-to realistic astrophysical situations (like the relativistic outflows discussed here) is not clear (see, e.g., the recent review by Vishniac et al 2003). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Hence, one can in principle suspect that amplification of the magnetic energy flux along the low-power jets between the subparsec and kiloparsec scales is required by the data, in agreement with the more detailed analysis of M87 . We note that amplification of a mean magnetic energy flux is indeed expected in any conductive plasma containing nonvanishing helicity of turbulent motions or a strong velocity shear, although the general applicability of the simple kinematic dynamo theory-usually considered in this context-to realistic astrophysical situations (like the relativistic outflows discussed here) is not clear (see, e.g., the recent review by Vishniac et al 2003). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…However, turbulence also acts to remove field lines from collapsing regions via reconnection diffusion and the magnetic field changes its topology in just an eddy turn over time (Lazarian & Vishniac 1999;Vishniac et al 2003;Lazarian et al 2004). Once rapid collapse begins, reconnection diffusion, which depends only on the properties of turbulence/turbulence amplitude, removes magnetic field from the contracting clouds in competition with the amplification the field experiences due to contraction and dynamo processes.…”
Section: Collapse Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technically, using the cosmic microwave pixel data map, we will calculate the cosmic microwave radiation temperature gradient measure using summation over pixel sets (by random walks method) instead of integration over subvolumes v r . The scaling of type (11) (if exists) will be then written as (12) where the metric scale r is replaced by number of the pixels, s, characterizing the size of the summation set (the random walk trajectory length). The χ s is a surrogate of the real 3D gradient measure χ r .…”
Section: Cmb Clustering and Intermittencymentioning
confidence: 99%