Problematic use of short periods of incarceration

Masson, Isla

doi:10.4324/9781315183794-2

Cited by 5 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Indeed, the “good mother” ideology, suggested to permeate contemporary cultures, has been found to be especially closely linked to women’s experiences of guilt and shame (Sutherland, 2010). This is an experience that is particularly accentuated in criminal justice contexts (Masson, forthcoming). In turn, these internalized emotions can negatively affect self-worth and identity.…”

Section: Restorative Justice: a Growing Field With A “Woeful Lack Of mentioning

confidence: 99%

Restorative Justice With Female Offenders: The Neglected Role of Gender in Restorative Conferencing

Österman

Masson

2017

Feminist Criminology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article presents findings from a new qualitative study into female offenders' experiences of restorative conferencing in England and Wales. It is argued that gendered factors of crime and victimization have a definite impact on the restorative conference process, particularly in the areas of complex and interacting needs, differently natured conference engagements, and risks around shame, mental health, and stereotypical ideals of female behavior. For women to reap the full benefits of restorative justice, it is argued that the particular needs and circumstances of female offenders must not only be acknowledged, but also incorporated into the field and mainstreamed into practice.

show abstract

Section: Restorative Justice: a Growing Field With A “Woeful Lack Of mentioning

confidence: 99%

Restorative Justice With Female Offenders: The Neglected Role of Gender in Restorative Conferencing

Österman

Masson

2017

Feminist Criminology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Unfortunately, these sentiments shared over a decade ago are still as relevant today (Women in Prison (WiP), 2017). Many have also argued that the overuse of short sentences for non-violent female offenders, be that on sentence or remand, serves little purpose, especially when removing women from the community (and, importantly, often from their children) for a short period of time (Baldwin and Epstein, 2017; Masson, 2014, forthcoming). This has continued despite repeated calls for better use of ‘alternatives’, for example, most recently the current Secretary of State for Justice, David Gauke, acknowledged how ‘diversion, restorative justice and community sentences continue to be underused’ ( The Times , May 2018).…”

Section: Looking To Evidence: a Shared Vision For Reformmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Many also report having been victims of both physical and sexual abuse (PRT, 2017b). Additionally, many live with, or are primary caregivers of, children prior to their imprisonment (Baldwin, 2015; Booth, 2017a, 2017b; Caddle and Crisp, 1997; Masson, 2014, forthcoming; PRT, 2015). It is these vulnerabilities that accompany women into the CJS that led Corston (2007: 16) to articulate that ‘equal treatment of men and women does not result in equal outcomes’.…”

Section: Looking To Evidence: a Shared Vision For Reformmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This ought to inform the conditions and treatment of the prison environment as well as the wider criminal justice system. We expect this framework will also show commitment to international guidelines (UN Bangkok Rules, 2010), and the growing evidence-base to ensure that operations in practice are concurrent with the vast knowledge which outlines the challenges faced by women in the CJS (Baldwin, 2018; Booth, 2017a, 2018; Crewe et al, 2018; Masson, 2014, forthcoming). Furthermore, it is encouraging to see the promise of a further Farmer Review focusing on females and their families affected by the criminal justice system.…”

Section: Looking To the Future: Can The Female Offender Strategy Delimentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Furthermore, it is encouraging to see the promise of a further Farmer Review focusing on females and their families affected by the criminal justice system. Within this, we hope to see ‘through the gate’ recognition and support for families affected by maternal imprisonment, with specific guidance and support in relation to rebuilding and reuniting families factored in to post-release supervision (Baldwin, 2017; Masson, 2014, forthcoming). However, we urge consideration of the diverse forms of ‘family’ alongside women’s lived experience and their histories that may feature abuse and dysfunctional relationships.…”

Section: Looking To the Future: Can The Female Offender Strategy Delimentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Promises, promises: Can the Female Offender Strategy deliver?

2018

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Following a number of postponements, the long awaited and much needed female offender strategy for England and Wales was finally published in June 2018. The strategy reflects the strong agreement across the sector of the need for a 'distinct' or 'gender specific' approach to respond to the vulnerabilities of women in the Criminal Justice System (CJS). Despite this, the strategy lacks clarity and offers little assurance that the direction taken will result in actual change and positive reform. It is vital that the government's implementation of the female offender strategy provides and demonstrates a genuine commitment to appropriate provision for females in the CJS through ring-fenced permanent funding as well as top-down accountability.

show abstract

Gendered prisons, relationships and resettlement policies; three reasons for caution for imprisoned mothers

Booth

2021

The British Journal of Criminology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Drawing on the lived experiences and perceptions of five imprisoned mothers, this article critically explores female prisons, relationships and resettlement policies in England and Wales. The findings indicate how the infusing of gendered, informal social controls into penal interventions and penal policy has the potential to harm mothers. This is why three reasons for caution are proposed in relation to ‘structural obstacles’, ‘continued exposure to abuse’ and ‘ascribed reputations’. With these challenges, the mother’s aspirations for a crime- and drug-free future may be thwarted. Therefore, by showing the complex and dynamic set of circumstances that mothers in prison must navigate, more clearly, the need for a nuanced approach for working with women can be appreciated.

show abstract

Problematic use of short periods of incarceration

Cited by 5 publications

References 0 publications

Restorative Justice With Female Offenders: The Neglected Role of Gender in Restorative Conferencing

Restorative Justice With Female Offenders: The Neglected Role of Gender in Restorative Conferencing

Promises, promises: Can the Female Offender Strategy deliver?

Gendered prisons, relationships and resettlement policies; three reasons for caution for imprisoned mothers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About