2011
DOI: 10.1002/jqs.1518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problematic but promising ponds? Palaeoenvironmental evidence from the Norse Eastern Settlement of Greenland

Abstract: Pollen-and related proxy-based studies of human-environment interactions during the Norse and later periods within Greenland have primarily involved the investigation of peat, lake and soil deposits, all of which have taphonomic and sampling problems. Many small ponds exist, but they seem to have been relatively ignored in investigations of palaeoecologically based environmental history. To evaluate their usefulness for studies of ecologically related cultural history, especially where sites are in intimate as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(52 reference statements)
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1) show that 9 14 C dating estimates fit totally or substantially within the nominal period of Norse settlement (cal AD 985-1450; Arneborg 1996; Seaver 2010; see discussion in Edwards et al 2011), while a tenth date (SUERC-38642) does so partly. The suspicion that 3 samples from site M21 might be modern, or perhaps non-contemporaneous with the group of bones that had a more aged aspect, would appear to be borne out by the 14 C estimates on 2 Ovis/Capra samples (both from house 1-2), which range from cal AD 1516-1953 (Raven et al 2002), differing significantly from terrestrial C 3 plants.…”
Section: General Observations On Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Table 1) show that 9 14 C dating estimates fit totally or substantially within the nominal period of Norse settlement (cal AD 985-1450; Arneborg 1996; Seaver 2010; see discussion in Edwards et al 2011), while a tenth date (SUERC-38642) does so partly. The suspicion that 3 samples from site M21 might be modern, or perhaps non-contemporaneous with the group of bones that had a more aged aspect, would appear to be borne out by the 14 C estimates on 2 Ovis/Capra samples (both from house 1-2), which range from cal AD 1516-1953 (Raven et al 2002), differing significantly from terrestrial C 3 plants.…”
Section: General Observations On Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Yet, Holocene climate records show distinct differences between the outer and the inner coastal region elsewhere in Greenland (Perren et al this volume) and the inner fjord regions represent an important ecoclimatic zone, which is unique in Greenland. Existing paleoenvironmental archives from this inner fjord region have mainly been studied for the evaluation of Norse impact during the last millennium (e.g., Fredskild 1992;Edwards et al 2011) as has the Lake Igaliku site (Gauthier et al 2010;Massa et al 2012;Perren et al 2012). However, in addition to its archaeological significance, this lacustrine sequence situated in the Norse Eastern Settlement contains an archive of *10,000 years of natural climatic and environmental evolution in a critical location for paleoclimatic studies in the North Atlantic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Edwards et al . ), these studies are from minerotrophic mires with small relevant source areas for pollen (RSAPs; cf. Sugita ; Bunting et al .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problems with radiocarbon dating (Edwards et al . , ) and hiatuses within the sediment column (Schofield et al . ; Schofield & Edwards ) have also been encountered.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%