Problematic Analysis of Cash Waqf Management in West Sumatera through Analytic Network Process (ANP) Approach

Abstract

Implementation of good governance in cash waqf institutions is a must. But in its implementation in West Sumatra there are still various problems in governance which have an impact on not maximizing the collection of cash waqf. Through the Analytic Network Process (ANP) approach this study tries to answer several questions: (1) what are the priority issues of cash waqf management, (2) What are the priority solutions for cash waqf management and (3) what are the cash waqf management strategy in West Sumatra. The results showed that the priority of problems in cash waqf management in West Sumatra in priority order were Human Resources (0.371), regulation (0.243), accountability (0.200) and products (0.184) with the rater agreement (W: 0.377). Priority results solutions with Human Resource solution sequences (0,367), regulator solutions (0.267), product solutions (0.183) and accountability (0.181). The results of the rater agreement with the value (0.348). While the results of the strategy in the order of collaboration with the Tungku Tigo Sajarangan are the top priority with a value (0.366), public education about cash waqf (0.324) and nazhir guidance and mauquf alaih (0.308). The rater agreement value is equal to (W: 0.111).

The Strategy of Nazir Development in Indonesia: A Qualitative Study

“…Nazir was selected among the people only on the basis of his beliefs, kinship or status, and even inheritance, without regard for his skill in administering waqf assets. As a result, the dominance of individual managers over corporate nazir remains (Ali et al, 2018;Baharuddin & Iman, 2018;Firdaus et al, 2019). Thera are also some assumptions that the nazir profession is voluntary and treated as a side job rather than the primary job (Huda et al, 2017 Second, its human resources, which include the recruitment of inept, old, and light-hearted individuals (Arifin, 2014).…”

“…Nazir currently does not comprehend waqf, has a low level of commitment, and is less than optimal in adhering to nazir's code of ethics. The government, Islamic institutions, and organizations have only followed nazir's guidance to a limited extent (Baharuddin & Iman, 2018;Firdaus et al, 2019).…”