2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0740-8188(02)00110-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problem statements in seven LIS journals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The starting point of 2010 was chosen because that is when the college was established. The cut-off date for the analysis, 2016, exceeded the five-year span for determining the changing trends in scholarly communication recommended in the literature (Stansbury, 2002). The two additional years were included to allow for possible delays in uploading research outputs on the institutional repository within a five-year span.…”
Section: Sample Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The starting point of 2010 was chosen because that is when the college was established. The cut-off date for the analysis, 2016, exceeded the five-year span for determining the changing trends in scholarly communication recommended in the literature (Stansbury, 2002). The two additional years were included to allow for possible delays in uploading research outputs on the institutional repository within a five-year span.…”
Section: Sample Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was logical to begin the analysis in 2010 since that was the year in which the academic institution that serves as the context for this study established a separate college for the education field [ 50 ]. The cut-off date of 2016 was selected arbitrarily, but it exceeds the minimum specified five-year timeframe for identifying trends and patterns in scholarly communication [ 51 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%