Problem‐Solving Orientations, Financial Self‐Efficacy, and Student‐Loan Repayment Stress

Abstract

Using data acquired from a four‐time longitudinal survey, we tested a model linking two measures of self‐agency, i.e., problem‐solving orientations and financial self‐efficacy, to student‐loan repayment stress. Of those participants who responded at Wave 4 (N = 855) of a longitudinal study, 396 who had acquired student loans were included in our structural equation model's Mplus analysis. After we controlled for gender, college financial education, ethnicity, and participant annual income, we found that both financial self‐efficacy and negative problem‐solving orientation were related to perceived difficulty. More specifically, those participants with a greater financial self‐efficacy at Wave 4 perceived less difficulty in paying off their loans, while those with a more negative problem‐solving orientation perceived more difficulty in paying off their loans. We also found perceived difficulty to be directly related to the actual difficulty of repaying a loan, and this perceived difficulty was, in turn, associated with loan‐specific stress. We provide implications for financial education.

Understanding fintech continuance: perspectives from self-efficacy and ECT-IS theories

“…and Friedman (2009) recommended the use of domain-specific self-efficacy rather than general self-efficacy because domain-specific self-efficacy has been shown to have greater predictive power when describing a specific phenomenon (Betz and Hackett, 1983;Cassar and Friedman, 2009;Gist, 1987). Domain-specific self-efficacy has been developed in a wide variety of research contexts (Chen, 2017;Shim et al, 2019;Yeşilyurt et al, 2016). The studies related to domain-specific self-efficacy are summarized in Understanding fintech continuance characteristics of fintech services for wealth management, people must measure both their financial management capability and their ability to use technology.…”

Launching a Text Message Intervention to Assist Student Loan Borrowers with Repayment Decisions

“…Student loan debt has become a financial and psychological burden for many young adults (Montalto, Phillips, McDaniel, & Baker, 2019;Zhang & Kim, 2019). When it comes to repayment, evidence strongly suggests that students are confused both about their borrowing practices and their options for repayment (Shim, Serido & Lee, 2018;Whitsett & O'Sullivan, 2012). Students lack an understanding of the most basic information such as the amount they owe on their loans, interest rates, and terms of repayment (Andruska, Hogarth, Fletcher, Forbes, & Wohlgemuth, 2014;Johnson, O'Neill, Worthy, Lown, & Bowen, 2016;Mueller, 2014).…”

The sustainable development of university student loans based on the evolutionary game

“…Scholars Catherine et al (2019) and Robin and Wilmarth (2018) studied student loans from the perspective of students’ financial health, pointing out that students’ loan decisions, non-payment rates and default rates are related to the financial health of students and their degree of financial education. However, scholars Shim et al (2019) and Sato et al (2019) believe that default rates are closely related to the psychological state of students. Li (2019) showed in his research that one of the main reasons restricting university students from actively repaying their loans is that students lack education in integrity, and suggests that educational institutions, students themselves and parents should jointly cultivate students’ sense of social responsibility, and strengthen students’ education in integrity so that they switch from having to be chased for repayments to actively repaying loans.…”