“…This low disciplinary heterogeneity and the consequent low cognitive diversity (Shin et al, 2012), together with conservatism and conformism, polarization, and dogmatic behavior may adversely affect the decision-making phase of a project where particularly creativity and multiple approaches are important (Adams, 1996). Secondly, at the dynamic level, I have observed that the project team could be affected by (1) a drift towards bureaucracy (the means becomes the end) with administrative loops (inducing frustration and time-wasting); (2) unnecessary use of regulations and laws to induce fear in potential defaulters (often to justify a role for administrative and jurisprudence professionals); (3) organizational and politically driven bad behaviors, for example, lack of time management, presence of 'alien' components inside the project team with the imposition of political outsiders who do not have any background in conservation projects ('time-thieves'; Carr & Hancock, 2006), or strong top-down hierarchy (inducing de-motivation in operators); and (4) poor behaviors, both at the individual and group level, such as procrastination (Gafni & Geri, 2010), negative/destructive thinking and cynicism (Smol, 2016), exclusion, and the 'boss-effect' (Battisti & Amori, 2016).…”