2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.soda.2022.100061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probiotics in bariatric surgery ensure greater lipids and glycemic profile with no effect on anthropometric measurements and inflammatory markers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of RCT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our pilot study of patients who underwent bariatric surgery, we did not appreciate a clinical or statistically significant difference in the mean rate of weight loss between the groups who received LGG versus placebo. Our study findings are in keeping with results demonstrated by a systematic review and meta-analysis of 5 randomized controlled trials including a total of 279 patients after bariatric surgery in which no significant difference in percent excess weight loss at 3 months, change in BMI, waist circumference change or fat mass change was noted between the probiotic and placebo groups [26]. However, it should be noted that if there were some minor impact of oral probiotics on weight loss, this may be masked by the substantial effect of bariatric surgery on weight loss, resulting in no measurable difference between the two groups.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In our pilot study of patients who underwent bariatric surgery, we did not appreciate a clinical or statistically significant difference in the mean rate of weight loss between the groups who received LGG versus placebo. Our study findings are in keeping with results demonstrated by a systematic review and meta-analysis of 5 randomized controlled trials including a total of 279 patients after bariatric surgery in which no significant difference in percent excess weight loss at 3 months, change in BMI, waist circumference change or fat mass change was noted between the probiotic and placebo groups [26]. However, it should be noted that if there were some minor impact of oral probiotics on weight loss, this may be masked by the substantial effect of bariatric surgery on weight loss, resulting in no measurable difference between the two groups.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The research primarily concentrated on obese individuals with NAFLD aged one day to 85 years old. The main measured indicators were body weight ( 23 , 28 , 56 , 59 , 69 85 ), BMI ( 23 , 28 , 56 , 59 , 60 , 65 , 69 82 , 84 105 ), WC ( 28 , 68 , 70 , 72 , 75 , 79 81 , 85 , 87 , 90 , 93 , 94 , 99 , 101 ), hip circumference (HC) ( 90 ), waist to hip ratio (WHR) ( 78 , 80 , 90 , 94 ), body fat percent (BF%) ( 71 , 75 , 80 , 85 , 90 , 94 ), and BFM ( 56 , 61 , 71 , 72 , 75 , 80 , 81 , 90 ). Probiotic supplementation significantly reduced weight, BMI, WC, BF%, and BFM across most studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%