Probiotic Pediococcus pentosaceus ABY 118 to Modulation of ChIFN-γ and ChIL-10 in Broilers Infected by Eimeria tenella Oocyst

Yulianto, Andreas Berny; Suwanti, Lucia Tri; Widiyatno, Thomas Valentinus; Suwarno, Suwarno; Yunus, Muchammad; Tyasningsih, Wiwiek; Hidanah, Sri; Sjofjan, Osfar; Lokapirnasari, Widya Paramita

doi:10.1155/2021/1473208

Cited by 8 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The observed variables included dry matter intake, organic matter intake, ash intake, crude protein intake, ether extract intake, crude fiber intake, organic matter intake, feed conversion ratio and feed efficiency. All variables were calculated with the following 7,[22][23][24] :…”

Section: Experimental Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Efficacy of Moringa oleifera Lam. extracts and Pediococcus pentosaceus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus plantarum probiotic during starter period on growth performance of male broiler chicken

Karwanti

Arumdani²,

Yulianto³

et al. 2023

F1000Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Probiotics and medicinal plants have been used to support human and livestock health. This research aimed to evaluate the potential of Moringa oleifera Lam. leaf extract on the growth of Pediococcus pentosaceus, Lactobacillus acidophilus and L. plantarum probiotic in vitro and to prove its potential as a feed additive, as an alternative to antibiotic growth promoters (AGP) to improve nutrient intake, body weight gain, feed conversion ratio and feed efficiency in broiler chicken starter phase. Methods: This study consisted of three sub studies: (1) Screening test for phytochemical compounds; (2) evaluation of several doses of Moringa extract (0%, 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3% ). At the end of treatment, each colony was measured using the total plate count; (3) evaluation of probiotics and M. oleifera in vivo to prove growth performance on starter-phase broiler chicken. All results were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) then followed by the Duncan test. Results: (1) The phytochemical screening test M. oleifera extract contained flavonoids, saponins, tannins, triterpenoids and alkaloids; (2) M. oleifera extract at doses of 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3% increased the growth of bacteria Pediococcus pentosaceus, Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (p<0.05); (3) The use of probiotics, M. oleifera extract and their combination showed that body weight, body weight gain, feed conversion rate (FCR) and feed efficiency signifcantly differed (p <0.05) between the treatments, but there was no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the treatments on nutrient intake (dry matter, ash, crude protein, crude fiber and organic matter) on broiler chicken starter phase. Conclusions: The use of M.oleifera extract at doses of 0.1%, 0.2% and 0.3% increased the growth of P. pentosaceus, L. acidophilus and L. plantarum bacteria in vitro and the use of probiotics, M.oleifera extract and their combination by in vivo improved the growth performance on starter phase of broilers chicken.

show abstract

Section: Experimental Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Several probiotics improving production performance in broilers are P. pentosaceus, Bifidobacterium sp, Lactobacillus casei, and Lactobacillus acidophilus. [7][8][9][10][11][12] P. pentosaceus is a Gram-positive bacteria, round-shaped, non-motile, not generating spores, and has negative catalase. As it grows, P. pentosaceus generates lactic acid and pediocin.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Efficacy of Moringa oleifera Lam. extracts and Pediococcus pentosaceus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus plantarum probiotic during starter period on growth performance of male broiler chicken

Karwanti

Arumdani²,

Yulianto³

et al. 2023

F1000Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…At 12 days post-hatch, the BUT diet resulted in 17 differentially abundant bacteria that are present in low abundance, including a reduction of L. brevis (-2.1 l2fc, 1.1e-3% depth) and in lesser extend to other enterococcal species (all below 70% coverage), leading us to conclude that at least E. hirae and E. faecium are present in the jejunal microbiota of these broilers and affected by butyrate supplementation (table s10). This analysis was repeated for the bacteria L. mucosae, L. vaginalis, L. brevis, L. amylovarus, L. helveticus, P. pentosaceus and W. paramesenteroides since these are considered beneficial to gut health and applied in probiotics [42][43][44][45][46][47]. L. mucosae and L. brevis were shown to decrease in abundance at 12 days post-hatch as a result Due to the low number of reads and coverage, the differential abundance of L. vaginalis, L. amylovarus and L. helveticus at 33 days post-hatch could therefore not be confirmed.…”

Section: Lactobacillusmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of diet on jejunal microbiota composition during broiler development with special focus onEnterococcus hiraeandEnterococcus faecium

Stege

Schokker

Harders

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Modern broiler breeds allow for high feed efficiency and rapid growth, but come at a cost of increased susceptibility to pathogens and disease. Broiler growth rate, feed efficiency, and health are furthermore affected by the composition of the gut microbiota, which in turn is influenced by diet composition. In this study we therefore assessed how diet composition alters the broiler jejunal gut microbiota. A total of 96 broiler chickens were divided into four diet groups: control, coated butyrate supplementation, medium chain fatty acid supplementation, or a high-fibre low-protein content. Diet groups were sub-divided into age groups (4, 12 and 33 days of age) resulting in groups of 8 broilers per diet per age. The jejunum content jejunum was used for metagenomic shotgun sequencing to determine the microbiota composition on species level. Among all diet groups, a total of 104 differential abundant bacterial species were detected. Most notably were the changes in the jejunal microbiota induced by butyrate supplementation when compared to the control diet, resulting in the reduced relative abundance of mainly Enterococcus faecium and the opportunistic pathogen Enterococcus hirae in broilers 4 days post-hatch. At this early stage of development, the immune system is still immature thereby highlighting the importance to study the relation of diet and the jejunal microbiota. Future studies should furthermore elucidate how diet can be used to promote a beneficial microbiota in the early stages of broiler development.

show abstract

“…Probiotics are non-pathogenic living microorganisms that benefit the host through the intestinal microflora balance. Some probiotics that are often used to improve performance in poultry are Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Pediococcus pentosaceus ABY 118 [6][7][8][9]. The content of appropriate and effective probiotic bacteria before consumption is recommended (10 8 -10 9 CFU/g) so that an effective dose can be achieved in the large intestine (10 6 -10 7 CFU/g) [10,11].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of probiotic and Moringa oleifera extract on performance, carcass yield, and mortality of Peking duck

et al. 2022

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Aim: Antibiotics have been used as growth promoters in poultry. However, continuous and long-term antibiotics can cause resistance, suppress the immune system, and accumulate toxic residue. To overcome these problems, feed additives that are safe for livestock and health for humans are needed, including probiotics. Therefore, the study aimed to determine the effect of probiotics (Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus lactis, and Bifidobacterium spp.) and Moringa oleifera extract on performance (body weight gain, body weight, feed intake, feed efficiency, and feed conversion ratio [FCR]), carcass yield (carcass weight and percentage of carcass) and mortality of Peking duck. Materials and Methods: This study used 48 Peking ducks, divided into four treatments and six replications. Each replication consisted of two ducks. The treatments were as follows: T0=control, T1=4 mL containing 1.2×108 CFU/mL of probiotic in drinking water, T2=4 mL containing M. oleifera extract in drinking water, and T3=2 mL containing 1.2×108 CFU/mL of probiotic in drinking water+2 mL containing M. oleifera extract in drinking water. The probiotics consist of L. acidophilus, L. casei, L. lactis, and Bifidobacterium spp. The data were statistically analyzed through analysis of variance. For the follow-up test, a multiple range test was conducted. Results: There was no significant difference (p>0.05) between body weight, feed intake, and mortality treatments. By contrast, control and treatment showed a significant difference (p<0.05) on feed efficiency, FCR, body weight gain, carcass weight, and percentage of carcass weight. Results of body weight gain statistics showed no significant difference (p>0.05) between T0 and T1, but T0 and T1 showed a significant difference with T2 and T3. The results of the feed efficiency statistic showed no significant difference (p>0.05) between T0, T1, and T2, but there was a significant difference between T0, T1, and T3. Feed efficiency at T2 showed no significant difference with T3, T1, and T0. The results of the FCR statistic showed no significant difference (p>0.05) between T0, T1, and T2, but there was a significant difference between T0, T1, and T3. FCR at T2 showed no significant difference with T3, T1, and T0. The carcass weight statistic showed no significant difference (p>0.05) between T0, T1, and T3, but there was a significant difference between T0 and T2. T2 showed no significant difference with T1 and T3. The carcass percentage statistic showed no significant difference (p>0.05) between T0 and T1, but T0 and T1 showed a significant difference (p<0.05) with T2 and T3. Conclusion: Based on the study results, it can be concluded that the use of a combination of probiotics (L. acidophilus, L. casei, L. lactis, and Bifidobacterium spp.) and M. oleifera extract can increase the production performance of Peking ducks and is safe for ducks' health.

show abstract

Probiotic Pediococcus pentosaceus ABY 118 to Modulation of ChIFN-γ and ChIL-10 in Broilers Infected by Eimeria tenella Oocyst

Cited by 8 publications

References 30 publications

Efficacy of Moringa oleifera Lam. extracts and Pediococcus pentosaceus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus plantarum probiotic during starter period on growth performance of male broiler chicken

Efficacy of Moringa oleifera Lam. extracts and Pediococcus pentosaceus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus plantarum probiotic during starter period on growth performance of male broiler chicken

Impact of diet on jejunal microbiota composition during broiler development with special focus onEnterococcus hiraeandEnterococcus faecium

Effect of probiotic and Moringa oleifera extract on performance, carcass yield, and mortality of Peking duck

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About