Probing user perceptions of service quality: using focus groups to enhance quantitative surveys

Abstract

Pencil‐and‐paper surveys can provide useful information about user perceptions of service quality in libraries, but qualitative methods must be used to gain more precise understanding of problem areas. Texas A&M University Libraries conducted focus group studies in spring 2001 with graduate and undergraduate studies in order to gather specific information related to their satisfaction with and confidence in the assistance provided at library service points. The sessions revealed that users were generally pleased with the assistance provided them by professional staff at reference desks and that they found librarians to be usually patient and helpful. Elements of dissatisfaction identified by the sessions included a sense of inability or unwillingness to assist at some service points and a perceived lack of knowledge of the library, particularly by student workers and staff at locations away from reference areas. The data are being used to improve library directional tools and to improve staff training for public services staff.

The value and impact of information provided through library services for patient care: a systematic review

“…Conclusions from this study and from earlier literature reviews 3,4 are that, in designing impact studies, qualitative as well as quantitative information should be considered. Qualitative data, using appropriate methodologies to ensure rigorous gathering, analysis and presentation of data, provide the grounding for quantitative approaches by identifying useful indicators 44−46 . The specific or general use design, with follow‐up user interviews, provide a practical and appropriate methodology when all possible attempts to reduce bias are included.…”

Exploring the consumption of charity-linked products

“…There are very interesting papers that use focus group research. They concern with the children's cultural worries (MacMullin and Odeh 1999), children's perception of smoking (Porcellato et al 2002), reasons for switching from the main food source (Wrigley et al 2004), students needs (Fagerheim and Weingart 2005) or library service quality (Satoh et al 2005), and the service quality perceptions (Crowley and Gilreath 2002).…”

Critical success criteria for B2B E-commerce systems in Chinese medical supply chain

“…The focus group technique is a very effective tool for obtaining consensual viewpoints in a short time on certain topics from a group of field experts (Evason and Whittington, 1997;Krueger, 1994;Crowley and Gilreath, 2002). The focus group in this research was conducted in…”