2020
DOI: 10.1186/s41313-020-00022-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing the transition from dislocation jamming to pinning by machine learning

Abstract: Collective motion of dislocations is governed by the obstacles they encounter. In pure crystals, dislocations form complex structures as they become jammed by their anisotropic shear stress fields. On the other hand, introducing disorder to the crystal causes dislocations to pin to these impeding elements and, thus, leads to a competition between dislocation-dislocation and dislocation-disorder interactions. Previous studies have shown that, depending on the dominating interaction, the mechanical response and … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The training was done independently for each feature. Interestingly the critical precipitate density found for each feature was in reasonable agreement across all three features (Salmenjoki et al 2020).…”
Section: Machine Learning In Dislocation Dynamics and Crystal Plasticitysupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The training was done independently for each feature. Interestingly the critical precipitate density found for each feature was in reasonable agreement across all three features (Salmenjoki et al 2020).…”
Section: Machine Learning In Dislocation Dynamics and Crystal Plasticitysupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The data-driven approaches applied to DDD, apart from a 1D case (Sarvilahti et al 2020) use hand-crafted features in the spirit of traditional phenomenology, although sophisticated inclusion of crystal symmetries or other physical insights have not yet been used (Salmenjoki et al 2018;Salmenjoki et al 2020;Steinberger et al 2019). While working along known phenomenons is beneficial to support and understand existing models, it is unlikely to reveal a lot of new physics.…”
Section: Machine Learning In Dislocation Dynamics and Crystal Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, initial pre-deformation improves the predictive ability of the model. Similar topological descriptors were employed [ 170 ] to characterize precipitates-mediated jamming-to-pinning transition in terms of the dislocation network topology. Using dislocation structures as input, a confusion algorithm was successfully trained based on the binary classification of states according to the probability of being a member of the pinned or jammed phases.…”
Section: Learning From Crystal Defects: Dislocation Ensemblesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern machine learning methods provide a promising alternative pathway for the systematic development of structure-based predictions, 3 as has been shown in the context of molecular properties, [4][5][6] density functional theory force fields, [7][8][9] governing equations for dynamical systems and flow [10][11][12] and dislocation models for crystal plasticity. [13][14][15] Applications to glasses have been so far restricted to idealized models, so-called Lennard-Jones glasses, that were analyzed with support vector machines (SVM) , [16][17][18] graph neural networks (GNN) 19 and deep learning. 20,21 Predictions based on deep learning methods are becoming increasingly accurate but they are also hard to interpret.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%