2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.84.014026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing the three-gluon correlation functions by the single spin asymmetry inppDX

Abstract: We study the single transverse-spin asymmetry for the inclusive open-charm production in the pp-collision, p ↑ p → DX, induced by the three-gluon correlation functions in the polarized nucleon. We derive the corresponding twist-3 cross section formula in the leading order with respect to the QCD coupling constant. As in the case of the semi-inclusive deep inelastic scattering, ep ↑ → eDX, our result differs from the previous result in the literature. We also derive a "master formula" which expresses the twist-… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
92
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
10
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A relation between k ⊥ momentum of the odderon and the collinear twist-3 C-odd tri-gluon correlation has been established. It is straightforward to extend our formalism to study SSAs in open charm production in pp collisions and in Drell-Yan/direct photon processes, which already have been calculated in the collinear twist-3 framework [40,41] (for earlier work, see [39]). It is our plan to further explore the possible difference/relation between the CGC formalism and the collinear twist-3 approach in computing SSAs at small x.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A relation between k ⊥ momentum of the odderon and the collinear twist-3 C-odd tri-gluon correlation has been established. It is straightforward to extend our formalism to study SSAs in open charm production in pp collisions and in Drell-Yan/direct photon processes, which already have been calculated in the collinear twist-3 framework [40,41] (for earlier work, see [39]). It is our plan to further explore the possible difference/relation between the CGC formalism and the collinear twist-3 approach in computing SSAs at small x.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much theoretical work has been performed over the years to develop the collinear twist-3 formalism needed to describe these proton-proton SSAs [14][15][16][17][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] and DSAs [32][33][34][35][36][37][38], including recent extensions to include fragmentation effects [26,27,29,30,38] and tri-gluon correlations [31,37,[39][40][41][42]. Nevertheless, whether this framework can provide a * tuf29138@temple.edu † koike@phys.sc.niigata-u.ac.jp ‡ metza@temple.edu § dpitonyak@quark.phy.bnl.gov ¶ marc.schlegel@uni-tuebingen.de definitive explanation of these observables (especially SSAs) remains an open question.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence our STSA-generating mechanism is distinctively different from the Collins [27] and Sivers [15,16] effects, and is more akin to (though still different from) the higher-twist mechanisms of [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(32a) stems from the multiple interactions with the target (higher-twist effects), and its contribution is in fact zero in the linearized (leading-twist) approximation. In this sense the above mechanism for generating STSA is similar in spirit to the higher-twist mechanisms of [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26], though a detailed comparison of the diagrams appears to indicate that the two approaches are, in fact, different.…”
Section: B Spin Asymmetry and C-parity In Quark Productionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation