Probing the processing of facial expressions in monkeys via time perception and eye tracking

Abstract

Accurately recognizing facial expressions is essential for effective social interactions. Non-human primates (NHPs) are widely used in the study of the neural mechanisms underpinning facial expression processing, yet it remains unclear how well monkeys can recognize the facial expressions of other species such as humans. In this study, we systematically investigated how monkeys process the facial expressions of conspecifics and humans using eye-tracking technology and sophisticated behavioral tasks, namely the temporal discrimination task (TDT) and face scan task (FST). We found that monkeys showed prolonged subjective time perception in response to Negative facial expressions in monkeys while showing longer reaction time to Negative facial expressions in humans. Monkey faces also reliably induced divergent pupil contraction in response to different expressions, while human faces and scrambled monkey faces did not. Furthermore, viewing patterns in the FST indicated that monkeys only showed bias toward emotional expressions upon observing monkey faces. Finally, masking the eye region marginally decreased the viewing duration for monkey faces but not for human faces. By probing facial expression processing in monkeys, our study demonstrates that monkeys are more sensitive to the facial expressions of conspecifics than those of humans, thus shedding new light on inter-species communication through facial expressions between NHPs and humans.

Thoughtful faces: inferring internal states across species using facial features

“…The fact that different states are associated with distinct constellations of facial features points to a role of facial expressions beyond emotional expression. Facial expressions have so far been mostly studied in a social or emotional context, and mostly in social species such as monkeys (28, 61) and humans (25, 62). In mice, until recently facial expressions were thought to mainly reflect pain (29, 63, 64), until careful analyses using machine-learning algorithms identified their facial expressions as innate and accurate reflections of several emotional states as well (22, 31, 65).…”

From beasts to bytes: Revolutionizing zoological research with artificial intelligence

“…Animal behavior is critically related to neural activity, neurological function, and cognitive states. Research has uncovered the mechanisms that govern a variety of complex animal behaviors, including those related to feeding ( Shafiullah et al, 2019 ), anxiety, and mating ( Moulin et al, 2021 ), as well as the analysis of daily behaviors ( Liu et al, 2022 ) and recognition of behaviors based on facial expressions ( Liu et al, 2023 ). However, the core problem lies in the extraction of meaningful information from the wealth of data on animal behavior within the context of neuroscience, propelled by advancements in experimental techniques ( Bath et al, 2014 ; Scaplen et al, 2019 ; Svensson et al, 2018 ).…”

Impact of letters to the editor and publications in 2023

“…For instance, Nadal-Nicolás et al ( 2023 ) thoroughly reviewed and analyzed the specificity of nine markers for the unambiguous identification of all or most RGCs (i.e., pan-RGC markers), a crucial prerequisite for studying their degeneration and neuroprotection, across rats, mice, and macaques. Liu et al ( 2023 ) revealed that monkeys show heightened sensitivity to the facial expressions of conspecifics compared to those of humans, offering new insights into inter-species communication. Li et al ( 2023 ) presented a comprehensive analysis of the genetic and physiological attributes critical for the sustained expansion of undifferentiated spermatogonial stem cells in tree shrews and proposed an effective strategy for extended in vitro maintenance.…”