2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.93.094513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing the pairing symmetry in the over-doped Fe-based superconductorBa0.35Rb0.65Fe2As2as a function of hydrostatic pressure

Abstract: Probing the pairing symmetry in the over-doped Fe- We report muon spin rotation experiments on the magnetic penetration depth λ and the temperature dependence of λ −2 in the over-doped Fe-based high-temperature superconductor (Fe-HTS) Ba1−xRbxFe2As2 (x = 0.65) studied at ambient and under hydrostatic pressures up to p = 2.3 GPa. We find that in this system λ −2 (T ) is best described by d-wave scenario. This is in contrast to the case of the optimally doped x = 0.35 system which is known to be a nodeless s +− … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For single crystals, f L varies between zero and unity as the orientation between field and polarization changes from being parallel to perpendicular. In addition to the magnetically ordered contribution, there is a PM signal component characterized by the densely distributed network of nuclear dipolar moments σ and dilute electronic moments with random orientations λ [28]. The temperature-dependent magnetic ordering fraction 0 ≤ F ≤ 1 governs the trade-off between magneticallyordered and PM behaviors.…”
Section: A Zero Field µSr Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For single crystals, f L varies between zero and unity as the orientation between field and polarization changes from being parallel to perpendicular. In addition to the magnetically ordered contribution, there is a PM signal component characterized by the densely distributed network of nuclear dipolar moments σ and dilute electronic moments with random orientations λ [28]. The temperature-dependent magnetic ordering fraction 0 ≤ F ≤ 1 governs the trade-off between magneticallyordered and PM behaviors.…”
Section: A Zero Field µSr Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The defining parameters in (2) are the precession frequency ν, the relaxation rates σ SC and σ nm characterizing the damping due to the formation of FLL in the SC state and the nuclear magnetic dipolar contribution, respectively, and an exponential relaxation rate for fieldinduced magnetism λ Mag [91]. The model in (2) has been previously used [28,92] for Fe-HTS in the presence of dilute or fast fluctuating electronic moments and it was demonstrated to be sufficiently precise for extracting the SC depolarization rate as a function of temperature.…”
Section: A Tf-µsr Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that for an electronic or magnetic pairing mechanism, some of the electrons are components of the pairing interaction, and therefore one expects ns/n<1. Using the experimental London penetration depth data of ΛBaRb=257 nm ΛBaRb=194 nm , λCaNa=0.89 , and adopting a comparable total coupling constant λBaRb1 and similar unscreened plasma frequencies, we estimate nsthinmathspacenormalBaRb0.6, only. This way by quenching the weakly coupled dxy ‐derived band by the combined effect of a weak magnetic field and disorder, the single ‐gap d ‐wave scenario might be in principle understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…If one wishes to do a similar study in the superconducting state, then some additional care must be taken to account for the possibility that not all electrons take part in forming the superconducting condensate. For example, a crude rescaling of the zero temperature London penetration depth Λ for hole ‐overdoped system Ba0.35Rb0.65Fe 2 As 2 , which is a candidate for d ‐wave superconductor as in Rb‐122, gives ΩpBaRbΩpCaNaΛBaRbfalse(0false)ΛCaNafalse(0false)false(1+λBaRbfalse)nBaRbnsCaNansBaRbnCaNafalse(1+λCaNafalse), where n is the total charge density of all conduction electrons, and ns is the part residing in the condensate at T=0. Note that for an electronic or magnetic pairing mechanism, some of the electrons are components of the pairing interaction, and therefore one expects ns/n<1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following these criteria, one may immediately conclude that s + id pairing favors the second-order phase while neither s + d nor s + is pairing do. The mixed-pairing state we consider above has been extensively studied in iron pnictides, particularly 122 compounds [60][61][62][63][64][65][66] like Ba 1−x K x Fe 2 As 2 . In these materials, the pairing symmetry is expected to change from a nodeless s ± form around optimal doping (x ∼ 0.4) [67] to a form with nodal gaps in the heavily hole-doped region, for instance, KFe 2 As 2 (x = 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%