2019
DOI: 10.3390/nano9050740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing the Optical Properties of MoS2 on SiO2/Si and Sapphire Substrates

Abstract: As an important supplementary material to graphene in the optoelectronics field, molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) has attracted attention from researchers due to its good light absorption capacity and adjustable bandgap. In this paper, MoS2 layers are respectively grown on SiO2/Si and sapphire substrates by atmospheric pressure chemical vapor deposition (APCVD). Atomic force microscopy, optical microscopy, and Raman and photoluminescence spectroscopy are used to probe the optical properties of MoS2 on SiO2/Si and s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
16
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(30 reference statements)
5
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth to mention that the frequency difference between the E 1 2g and A 1g is sensitive to the layer thickness. Raman frequency difference of MoS 2 flakes is ~19.6 cm −1 , in good agreement with that of monolayer MoS 2 in previous studies [ 32 ]. Thus, the thickness for the sample can be interpreted by a monolayer structure.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is worth to mention that the frequency difference between the E 1 2g and A 1g is sensitive to the layer thickness. Raman frequency difference of MoS 2 flakes is ~19.6 cm −1 , in good agreement with that of monolayer MoS 2 in previous studies [ 32 ]. Thus, the thickness for the sample can be interpreted by a monolayer structure.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Additionally, AFM was used to assess the thickness of as-grown MoS 2 flakes on the sapphire. A height profile along the black broken line is about 0.85 nm in Figure 4 d, which is consistent with the results of monolayer MoS 2 thickness reported in the literature [ 32 , 33 ]. An AFM image in the inset of Figure 4 d reveals that the sample has the classic monolayer topography.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These peaks were identified as contributions by the A excitons (∼1.837 eV), B excitons (∼1.98 eV), and negative trions (∼1.80 eV). 30,31 Raman measurements of the device channel (Figure 1(d)), on the other hand, showed the two dominant phonon modes of MoS 2 . 30,32 Fixed optical power (P laser ) was used in each set of measurements to ensure that the corresponding analysis were based on the fact that almost consistent amount of photons per unit time goes to the sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 shows the processing step before the data enters the model. Layer number labeling of the manual area circle mask (Mask) is performed and the data are divided when the captured image is converted into a spectrum image by using a hyperspectral image technology; we will measure the result on the basis of the Raman spectrum ( Figure S3 ) [ 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 ]. The categories are substrate, monolayer, bilayer, trilayer, bulk, and residues, which are our ground truths.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%