1998
DOI: 10.1109/59.651632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing the new IEEE Reliability Test System (RTS-96): HL-II assessment

Abstract: This paper presents a set of investigations about the bulk reliability performance evaluation of the new IEEE Reliability Test System ( RTS-96). Several bulk reliability system indices representing a hierarchical level two (HL-11) assessment of the new system are provided. The full representation including three areas is analyzed and all results are based on AC flows evaluations considering corrective remedial actions. The assessment tool was the NH-2 program.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The algorithm has been tested using two (small-and medium-size) IEEE-based power systems. The IEEE-RTS96 [26] builds on a basis of three IEEE-RTS24, each corresponding to one area. …”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm has been tested using two (small-and medium-size) IEEE-based power systems. The IEEE-RTS96 [26] builds on a basis of three IEEE-RTS24, each corresponding to one area. …”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the system peak load will be assumed to follow the hourly load shape of the IEEE-RTS (reliability test system). Based on this assumption, the load will be divided into ten levels using a clustering technique, utilizing the centroid sorting process, developed in [37], which verifies that ten chosen equivalent load levels, with different probabilities, provides a reasonable trade-off between accuracy and fast numerical evaluation [38,39]. In addition, recent studies demonstrate the characteristics of the load according to standard deviation function similar to electricity prices, with the advantages of being closer to the value of actual load when using previous survey data [40].…”
Section: Electrical Heating and Cooling Demandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UT approach allows the unreliability performance of a power system expressed by basic reliability indices [2,3], such as the loss of load probability (LOLP), loss of load expectation (LOLE), frequency of loss of load (FLOL), and expected energy not supplied (EENS), to be traced or allocated to every component in the system. Considerable work has been done [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] in developing power system reliability models and algorithms and reliability application and risk analysis, but there has been relatively little research on UT techniques. The relevant research is mainly focused on reliability analysis considering the class, order of contingencies, and the component failure causes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%