1995
DOI: 10.1093/nar/23.2.211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing the molecular mechanism of action of co-repressor in theE.colimethionine repressor-operator complex using surface plasmon resonance (SPR)

Abstract: We have studied quantitatively the effect of the corepressor, S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), on the interaction between the E. coli methionine repressor, MetJ, and an idealised operator fragment, by recording measurements of surface plasmon resonance using a BIAcore instrument. We have recorded kinetic binding data in the presence of SAM, which carries a net positive charge, and two corepressor analogues, adenosylornithine (AO) and aza-SAM, which differ in the location of the atom carrying the positive charge. Ou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, we were not able to determine the pH-dependent binding of AzaAdoMet to aLSMT due to the aggregation of the enzyme at pH values less than 7.0. Nonetheless, our data are consistent with surface plasmon resonance studies of the Escherichia coli methionine repressor MetJ and AzaAdoMet in which ligand binding was only observed under acidic conditions, eliciting co-repression comparable with AdoMet (47). In summary, these results demonstrate that the strength of the CH⅐⅐⅐O interactions are strongly dependent on the degree of polarization of the heteroatom to which the methyl group is covalently bonded.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, we were not able to determine the pH-dependent binding of AzaAdoMet to aLSMT due to the aggregation of the enzyme at pH values less than 7.0. Nonetheless, our data are consistent with surface plasmon resonance studies of the Escherichia coli methionine repressor MetJ and AzaAdoMet in which ligand binding was only observed under acidic conditions, eliciting co-repression comparable with AdoMet (47). In summary, these results demonstrate that the strength of the CH⅐⅐⅐O interactions are strongly dependent on the degree of polarization of the heteroatom to which the methyl group is covalently bonded.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In this analog, the polarization of the methyl group is dependent on the protonation state of its tertiary ␥-amine (pK a ϳ7.1), which mimics the AdoMet sulfonium cation (40,47). Under basic conditions, the methyl group is relatively unpolarized due to the amine's deprotonation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensorgrams for the aptamers binding to the fibrillar targets could not be fitted to this model due to the increasing extent of re-binding in the dissociation phase. To derive apparent affinities in these cases, we initially determined the apparent dissociation rates over a 30-s period, conditions where pseudo-first order behavior occurs (66), and then used these values in the instrument software to derive the apparent association rates and hence the apparent equilibrium constants, assuming a 1:1 binding model. The resultant 2 values (supplemental Table S1) suggest that the data were good fits to this model, which yielded apparent K D values of ϳ4 and ϳ7 nM for binding of M2 to the WL and LS fibril targets, respectively, with 2 values ϳ1.…”
Section: Selection Of Anti-␤ 2 M Amyloid Fibrilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each met-box is bound by a repressor dimer that also makes protein-protein contacts to neighbouring dimers leading to co-operative saturation of the operators [3,13,16]. Binding of two AdoMet (S-adenosylmethionine) co-repressor molecules to sites on the opposite side of the protein from the DNA-binding motif [2,16] has been postulated to create an unusual long-range electrostatic interaction with the phosphodiester backbone of DNA, raising DNA affinity at least 100-fold [17,18]. Sequence specificity arises via direct amino acid side chain hydrogen-bonding to the bases at positions 2 and 3 in the met-box, and symmetry-related positions in the larger operator, and via sequence-dependent distortions of the operator duplex at the centre of met-boxes and at the junction between them [2,3,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%