1998
DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560071216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing the ligand binding domain of the GluR2 receptor by proteolysis and deletion mutagenesis defines domain boundaries and yields a crystallizable construct

Abstract: Ionotropic glutamate receptors constitute an important family of ligand-gated ion channels for which there is little biochemical or structural data. Here we probe the domain structure and boundaries of the ligand binding domain of the AMPA-sensitive GluR2 receptor by limited proteolysis and deletion mutagenesis. To identify the proteolytic fragments, Maldi mass spectrometry and N-terminal amino acid sequencing were employed. Trypsin digestion of HSlS2 (Chen GQ, Gouaux E. 1997. Proc NarZAcad Sci USA 94:13431-13… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
68
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The full-length GluR4 LBD construct that had been used in previous solution scattering experiments ("S1S2-D") was generated using the baculovirus expression system and purified as previously described (24). Finally, a full-length GluR2 LBD ("S1S2L") was also refolded from bacterially expressed protein (23). S1S2L consisted of residues Ser 383 -Glu 524 (S1), a GTDGN linker, and Glu 627 -Asn 791 (S2), corresponding approximately to the GluR4 construct, but lacking N-and C-terminal FLAG and c-Myc tags, and with a shorter linker.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The full-length GluR4 LBD construct that had been used in previous solution scattering experiments ("S1S2-D") was generated using the baculovirus expression system and purified as previously described (24). Finally, a full-length GluR2 LBD ("S1S2L") was also refolded from bacterially expressed protein (23). S1S2L consisted of residues Ser 383 -Glu 524 (S1), a GTDGN linker, and Glu 627 -Asn 791 (S2), corresponding approximately to the GluR4 construct, but lacking N-and C-terminal FLAG and c-Myc tags, and with a shorter linker.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein Expression and Purification-The core GluR2 LBD ("S1S2J") that had been used in crystallographic studies of the domain was expressed bacterially, purified, and refolded as described (11,23). The full-length GluR4 LBD construct that had been used in previous solution scattering experiments ("S1S2-D") was generated using the baculovirus expression system and purified as previously described (24).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most importantly, there is no facile method to confirm that the truncations designed have retained the stable elements of the full-length protein. These approaches are problematic in structural genomics efforts, where high-throughput and low cost are dominating considerations (11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bacterial expression of soluble S1S2 has been demonstrated in the periplasm, although also at low yields and without glycosylation [14]. Substantially higher yields have been achieved in bacteria by refolding of inclusion-body material, although only for core constructs, in which S1 and S2 are restricted to the regions with PBP sequence homology [15].Such bacterially expressed protein was used to determine the first crystallographic structure of an S1S2 domain core, in complex with the agonist kainate [16]. It confirmed the PBP homology on a structural level, particularly to the glutaminebinding protein QBP.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%