2020
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa3629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing the impact of varied migration and gas accretion rates for the formation of giant planets in the pebble accretion scenario

Abstract: The final orbital position of growing planets is determined by their migration speed, which is essentially set by the planetary mass. Small mass planets migrate in type I migration, while more massive planets migrate in type II migration, which is thought to depend mostly on the viscous evolution rate of the disc. A planet is most vulnerable to inward migration before it reaches type II migration and can lose a significant fraction of its semi-major axis at this stage. We investigated the influence of differen… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The planet then starts to accrete gas from the protoplanetary disk, via a slow gas contraction followed by rapid runaway gas accretion, which is limited by the disk's supply rate, determined by viscosity. For gas accretion, we followed the approach outlined in Ndugu et al (2021), where the envelope contraction rate is modeled via Ikoma et al (2000), which depends not only on the planetary core mass, but also on the envelope opacity, κ env . For κ env we used a constant value of 0.05 cm 2 g −1 (Movshovitz & Podolak 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The planet then starts to accrete gas from the protoplanetary disk, via a slow gas contraction followed by rapid runaway gas accretion, which is limited by the disk's supply rate, determined by viscosity. For gas accretion, we followed the approach outlined in Ndugu et al (2021), where the envelope contraction rate is modeled via Ikoma et al (2000), which depends not only on the planetary core mass, but also on the envelope opacity, κ env . For κ env we used a constant value of 0.05 cm 2 g −1 (Movshovitz & Podolak 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the gas accretion rates in our nominal model are quite high (Fig. 1), we modeled the formation of Jupiter and Saturn in environments with a lower gas surface density because the gas surface density sets, alongside the viscosity, the gas accretion rate in the disk-limited regime (Ndugu et al 2021). The gas disk masses are 0.0256, 0.0128, and 0.00256 M for α = 10 −4 , 5 × 10 −4 , and 10 −3 , respectively, allowing the same gas delivery through the disk's accretion rate ( Ṁgas ∝ Σ g ν) for all models.…”
Section: Simple Growth Model For Jupiter and Saturnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 31) and (32) from Paardekooper (2014)). The dynamical torque can also help to significantly slow down inward migration of low mass planets, preventing large-scale migration of planets (Ndugu et al 2021).…”
Section: Migrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work we focus thus on a disk model that includes the growth and drift of pebbles (Birnstiel et al 2012) as well as evaporation and condensation at evaporation fronts. We then model the growth of planets via the accretion of pebbles (Johansen & Lambrechts 2017) and gas (Ndugu et al 2021) inside these disks, while tracing the chemical composition of the accreted material to derive the atmospheric C/O ratio as well as the heavy element content. Our model approach is outlined in the cartoon shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Planets that start to accrete gas efficiently start to open gaps in the protoplanetary disk and then migrate on a much longer timescale that depends on the depth of the gap (Kanagawa et al 2018). More massive planets open deeper gaps and thus migrate more slowly, also influenced by the gas accretion rate itself Bergez-Casalou et al 2020;Ndugu et al 2021). The migration speed in the type-II regime, and thus also the distance over which planets migrate, also crucially depends on the disk's viscosity.…”
Section: Planet Migration and The Timing Of Planet Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%