2019
DOI: 10.1002/wea.3506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing the ‘grey zone’ of NWP – is higher resolution always better?

Abstract: Steady progress in the development of computing technologies over the years has afforded scientists the opportunity to simulate the atmosphere with impeccable detail. Although the advantages of such increases in model resolution have been palpable, an unwanted obstacle has now emerged – a phenomenon known as the ‘grey zone’. This article presents a brief overview of the limitations the grey zone has come to present to modern weather modelling, as well as some of the latest techniques that researchers have deve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is one concern regarding the different approaches for turbulence parametrizations. While a three-dimensional turbulence closure (Heinze et al, 2017) was employed in the hectometer-scale simulations analysed, most km-scale models are equipped with a one-dimensional planetary boundary-layer scheme (e.g., Kealy, 2019). However, both hectometer-and km-scale models suffer from similar deficiencies: the lag in timing of the diurnal cycle of convection and a relative lack of convective organization, especially late in the day (e.g., Baldauf et al, 2011;Clark et al, 2016;Rasp et al, 2018).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is one concern regarding the different approaches for turbulence parametrizations. While a three-dimensional turbulence closure (Heinze et al, 2017) was employed in the hectometer-scale simulations analysed, most km-scale models are equipped with a one-dimensional planetary boundary-layer scheme (e.g., Kealy, 2019). However, both hectometer-and km-scale models suffer from similar deficiencies: the lag in timing of the diurnal cycle of convection and a relative lack of convective organization, especially late in the day (e.g., Baldauf et al, 2011;Clark et al, 2016;Rasp et al, 2018).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, finer grids are more prone to the so-called double penalty problem (Rossa et al 2008;Gilleland et al 2009), where features are slightly shifted in time and/or space compared to the truth (as represented by observations or analysis), resulting in verification penalties in both space-time locations (Colle et al 2000;Mass et al 2002;Michaelides 2008). When refining a model grid it is also important to be aware of the NWP gray zone (Zheng et al 2016;Chow et al 2019;Kealy 2019;Jeworrek et al 2019): Model setup can be challenging at grid spacings that are not fine enough to fully resolve processes explicitly, yet too fine to fully parameterize them using approximating schemes. These 'gray zone' scales differ for various processes (e.g., cumulus convection, turbulent eddies, orographic effects).…”
Section: Background and Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, finer the horizontal resolution better it is for simulating the wind farms. However, it is not advisable to keep the WRF model horizontal resolution finer than 1 km because of the "grey-zone" limitations related with PBL schemes (Kealy, 2019). Therefore, in this study we have used a horizontal resolution of 1 km for all the simulations.…”
Section: Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%