2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1908.08679
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing the Ginzburg-Landau Potential for Lasers Using Higher-order Photon Correlations

Naotomo Takemura,
Masato Takiguchi,
Masaya Notomi

Abstract: The lasing transition of "class-A" lasers, where the photon lifetime is much longer than the carrier lifetime, is analogous to the second-order phase transition and, in addition, there is the Ginzburg-Landau (GL) type theory. We theoretically examine the validity of the GL theory for lasers in terms of various parameters, particularly, the ratio between photon and carrier lifetimes. For this purpose, we propose a higher-order photon correlation (g (q) ) measurement to check whether or not the photon statistic… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 54 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although in this paper we concentrate on Class B lasers [37], i.e., devices where the dynamical behaviour is described by two variables (carrier density and photon number), a strong photon bunching before threshold has been numerically seen [38,39] and then carefully investigated also in Class A devices (typically described only by the dynamics of the photon number) [40]. The numerical predictions are consistent with theoretical analyses [41,42]. At the present time, much less is known on the equivalent features of Class A devices, given the intrinsic stiffness of their numerical simulations.…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
“…Although in this paper we concentrate on Class B lasers [37], i.e., devices where the dynamical behaviour is described by two variables (carrier density and photon number), a strong photon bunching before threshold has been numerically seen [38,39] and then carefully investigated also in Class A devices (typically described only by the dynamics of the photon number) [40]. The numerical predictions are consistent with theoretical analyses [41,42]. At the present time, much less is known on the equivalent features of Class A devices, given the intrinsic stiffness of their numerical simulations.…”
supporting
confidence: 67%