2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing the gas-phase oxidation of ammonia: Addressing uncertainties with theoretical calculations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A high BF 1b (>74%, see Mech2, Mech4, Mech5, and Mech7) also leads to the underestimation of the IDTs for neat NH 3 and NH 3 fuel blends under RCM conditions with elevated pressures. Recent theoretical calculations 60,66,67 all suggest k 1a should be increased in comparison to the value from Sumathi et al; 65 namely, BF 1b should be lowered. However, the reactivity is significantly underestimated for RCM conditions, when the BF 1b is lower than 23% (see Mech6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A high BF 1b (>74%, see Mech2, Mech4, Mech5, and Mech7) also leads to the underestimation of the IDTs for neat NH 3 and NH 3 fuel blends under RCM conditions with elevated pressures. Recent theoretical calculations 60,66,67 all suggest k 1a should be increased in comparison to the value from Sumathi et al; 65 namely, BF 1b should be lowered. However, the reactivity is significantly underestimated for RCM conditions, when the BF 1b is lower than 23% (see Mech6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Unlike the well-studied important reactions, e.g., NH 2 + NO and NH 2 + NO 2 , the rate coefficient ( k ) and the branching ratio of NH 2 + HO 2 have not been experimentally studied at combustion-related temperatures. However, several theoretical studies , were recently released regarding the calculation of the rate coefficient of R1 ( k 1 ). Therefore, this work focuses on discussing the effect of k 1 on model prediction.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations