2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c00531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing the Axial Distortion Effect on the Magnetic Anisotropy of Octahedral Co(II) Complexes

Abstract: Three mononuclear octahedral Co(II) complexes are reported, [Co(py) 4 (SCN) 2 ] (1), [Co(py) 4 (Cl) 2 ]•H 2 O (2), and [Co(py) 4 (Br) 2 ] ( 3), that exhibit different distortions with compression (1) or elongation (2 and 3) of the axial positions. Easy plane magnetic anisotropy was confirmed by magnetic, HF-EPR, and computational studies for all complexes. Further analyses indicate that both the sign and magnitude of zero-field splitting parameters experience a significant change (D ≥ ±150 cm −1 ) by tuning of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Making use of Equation , which considers both processes, in which the first term corresponds to the one‐phonon process (dominant in the low‐temperature regime) and the second term stands for the two‐phonon Raman process (responsible for the increase of the relaxation time at high temperatures), the following set of parameters are obtained: A direct =1282 s −1 K −1 , B Raman =1.38 s −1 K − n , n= 5.7. Notably, these values are in line with those previously reported for SIMs based on Co II trueτ-1=AdirectT+BRamanTn …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Making use of Equation , which considers both processes, in which the first term corresponds to the one‐phonon process (dominant in the low‐temperature regime) and the second term stands for the two‐phonon Raman process (responsible for the increase of the relaxation time at high temperatures), the following set of parameters are obtained: A direct =1282 s −1 K −1 , B Raman =1.38 s −1 K − n , n= 5.7. Notably, these values are in line with those previously reported for SIMs based on Co II trueτ-1=AdirectT+BRamanTn …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…For example, complexes cis ‐[Co II (dmphen) 2 (NCS) 2 ] [15] ( 8 ) (dmphen=2,9‐dimethyl‐1,10‐phenanthroline) and [Co(μ‐L)(μ‐CH 3 COO)Y(NO 3 ) 2 ] [25h] ( 9 ) (L=ferrocene based compartmental ligand) were found to possess very high easy‐plane anisotropy with D values of +98 cm −1 and +92 cm −1 with small U eff values of 17.0 cm −1 and 7.6 cm −1 , respectively (see Figure 3 b and Table 1). Very recently, Dunbar and co‐workers reported three pseudo‐octahedral complexes of general formula [Co(py) 4 X 2 ] [26] (where X=SCN, Cl and Br) out of which the Cl and the Br analogues (complexes 10 and 11 ) exhibit very high D values of +127 cm −1 and +139 cm −1 as obtained from NEVPT2 calculations along with U eff values of 19.3 cm −1 and 20.4 cm −1 , respectively, in the presence of a dc field (see Figure 3 c). Soon after, the same group reported another pseudo‐octahedral complex [Co(MeCN) 6 ](BF 4 ) 2 [27] ( 12 ) in which the D parameter (or B 2 0 parameter) was estimated to be +146.5 cm −1 from NEVPT2 calculations (+148.9 cm −1 from PHI fitting of the dc magnetic data) but with a smaller U eff value of 7.6 cm −1 .…”
Section: Zero‐field Splitting In Transition Metal‐based Simsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that the systems have a large unquenched orbital contribution, which is characteristic of Co(II) ions in pseudo-octahedral coordination. 59,60,[62][63][64][65][66][67] When lowering temperature, the cT product slowly decreases to the minimum of 1.64 cm 3 K mol À1 observed at 2 K, which is mainly due to spin orbit coupling (SOC). For Co(II) ions in a distorted octahedral geometry the rst order SOC would be important and the experimental data have been sometimes tted with the corresponding Hamiltonian.…”
Section: Magnetic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[67][68][69][70][71] Herein, we employed the later approach for sake of simplicity and to allow further comparison with published systems. 58,[60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67] This way, the ZFS Hamiltonian, as implemented in the PHI package (eqn (1)), was employed for the simultaneous t of the experimental susceptibility and magnetization curves.…”
Section: Magnetic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%