2020
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/ab8af9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing surface charge densities on optical fibers with a trapped ion

Abstract: We describe a novel method to measure the surface charge densities on optical fibers placed in the vicinity of a trapped ion, where the ion itself acts as the probe. Surface charges distort the trapping potential, and when the fibers are displaced, the ion's equilibrium position and secular motional frequencies are altered. We measure the latter quantities for different positions of the fibers and compare these measurements to simulations in which unknown charge densities on the fibers are adjustable parameter… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data in Figure 4b (lines) are fitted to the simulated field from uniform charge densities on these sidewalls, producing values up to 2500 elementary charges per µm 2 (Table 2). This is larger than the charge densities reported on fiber surface near ions [65] and on a planar trap [63], but these materials and geometries may not be comparable. The model uses seven free parameters: a uniform charge density on each of the spacers 1-4 that control field curvature along the axis, and the three components of a constant, arbitrary field E offset that set the offset.…”
Section: Measuring Stray Static Electric Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The data in Figure 4b (lines) are fitted to the simulated field from uniform charge densities on these sidewalls, producing values up to 2500 elementary charges per µm 2 (Table 2). This is larger than the charge densities reported on fiber surface near ions [65] and on a planar trap [63], but these materials and geometries may not be comparable. The model uses seven free parameters: a uniform charge density on each of the spacers 1-4 that control field curvature along the axis, and the three components of a constant, arbitrary field E offset that set the offset.…”
Section: Measuring Stray Static Electric Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The magnitude of field components in both traps is similar to many single-wafer surface traps [19,30,43,46,[59][60][61][62] made from a variety of materials and measured at different temperatures and ion-surface distances. Proposed sources of such fields include charge present on dielectric or metal surfaces [63][64][65], as well as patch potentials comprising surface oxides [49,66] or adsorbates [67][68][69]. These sources can contribute to field offsets if they are distant or distributed, or to field curvature if they are close and point-like.…”
Section: Measuring Stray Static Electric Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Excluding the point corresponding to the shortest distance of d = 250 µm results in a value of χ 2 ν = 0.86, demonstrating strong agreement. At this short distance, the axial trapping potential is significantly influenced by inhomogeneously distributed surface charges, which, however, are not considered in the simulations [38]. Potentially, more information could be extracted by measuring a frequency scaling similar to that of Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No significant mechanical modes are found below 20 kHz, which would be helpful for stabilizing the cavity frequency. Our method could be exploited for characterizing not only the cavities for atomor ion-based quantum networks [26,45,47,48], but also other Fabry-Pérot cavities in which fundamental quantum optics [49], precision measurement [50], and manybody physics are investigated [51][52][53].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%