2004
DOI: 10.1063/1.1804238
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing subpicosecond dynamics using pulsed laser combined scanning tunneling microscopy

Abstract: Time-resolved tunneling current measurement in the subpicosecond range was realized by ultrashort-pulse laser combined scanning tunneling microscopy, using the shaken-pulse-pair method. A low-temperature-grown GaN x As 1−x ͑x = 0.36% ͒ sample exhibited two ultrafast transient processes in the time-resolved tunnel current signal, whose lifetimes were determined to be 0.653± 0.025 and 55. Smaller and faster are the key words in the progress of current nanoscience and technology. Thus, for further advances, a met… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
76
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
76
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the spatial and temporal resolutions of the former method were limited to the 1 µm scale and laser-pulse repetition rate, respectively, and the PG-STM probes dI/dV or the quantity mediating the signal rather than the transient effect itself [18]. With the shaken-pulse-pair-excited STM (SPPX-STM) [19,20], which was designed to detect a weak tunneling current of the transient signal under optical excitation, the time-resolved tunneling current in the subpicosecond range was successfully probed; however, its temporal range was very narrow and it was still difficult to reliably measure a very weak time-resolved STM signal in a short period of time, preventing the microscopy technique from revealing transient carrier dynamics in nanostructures consisting of composite materials with a wide variety of lifetimes. The long measurement time interferes the imaging of dynamics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the spatial and temporal resolutions of the former method were limited to the 1 µm scale and laser-pulse repetition rate, respectively, and the PG-STM probes dI/dV or the quantity mediating the signal rather than the transient effect itself [18]. With the shaken-pulse-pair-excited STM (SPPX-STM) [19,20], which was designed to detect a weak tunneling current of the transient signal under optical excitation, the time-resolved tunneling current in the subpicosecond range was successfully probed; however, its temporal range was very narrow and it was still difficult to reliably measure a very weak time-resolved STM signal in a short period of time, preventing the microscopy technique from revealing transient carrier dynamics in nanostructures consisting of composite materials with a wide variety of lifetimes. The long measurement time interferes the imaging of dynamics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This idea has been realized recently and named SPPX-STM [26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. In SPPX-STM, the optical intensity is nearly unchanged at the modulation frequency, and hence, the thermal interference is markedly suppressed.…”
Section: Shaken-pulse-pair-excited Stm(sppx-stm)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In principle, a newly developed microscopic technique, shaken-pulse-pair-excited STM (SPPX-STM) [26][27][28][29][30][31][32] In this article, we briefly review attempts to improve resolutions by combining STM with ultrafast laser technology and describe the features and critical issues. Furthermore, we show the development of SPPX-STM and its principle and application.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, if the tunneling process directly produced by optical excitation can be measured, high temporal and spatial sensitivity can be simultaneously achieved with the atomic-scale resolution of STM [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. A promising setup for achieving this is pulse-pair-excited STM (PPX-STM), in which, in analogy with pump-probe experiments, a sequence of paired laser pulses with a certain delay time t d excites the sample surface beneath the STM tip, and the tunneling current I is measured as a function of t d .…”
Section: Photoexcitation Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%