2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2209.14280
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing strong-field QED in beam-plasma collisions

A. Matheron,
P. San Miguel Claveria,
R. Ariniello
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The self fields of colliding beams are ideally suited for SF-QED: they are well-defined and quasi-static (nonoscillating in space and time), thus providing a highly controllable platform, as compared with laser-based configurations [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46] and beam-plasma interactions [47]. The locally constant field approximation (LCFA) [5,9,10,[48][49][50][51][52], usually invoked in the SF-QED theory, is valid in leptonic collisions [12,26].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The self fields of colliding beams are ideally suited for SF-QED: they are well-defined and quasi-static (nonoscillating in space and time), thus providing a highly controllable platform, as compared with laser-based configurations [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46] and beam-plasma interactions [47]. The locally constant field approximation (LCFA) [5,9,10,[48][49][50][51][52], usually invoked in the SF-QED theory, is valid in leptonic collisions [12,26].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%