2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c00638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing Solute–Solvent Interactions of Transition Metal Complexes Using L-Edge Absorption Spectroscopy

Abstract: In order to tailor solution-phase chemical reactions involving transition metal complexes, it is critical to understand how their valence electronic charge distributions are affected by the solution environment. Here, solute–solvent interactions of a solvatochromic mixed-ligand iron complex were investigated using X-ray absorption spectroscopy at the transition metal L 2,3 -edge. Due to the selectivity of the corresponding core excitations to the iron 3d orbitals, the method grants direc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(160 reference statements)
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Fe L-edge probes transitions from the metal 2p core-orbitals into the valence. These transitions monitor the projection of the unoccupied levels around the metal, being highly sensitive to the 3d orbital occupation, as well as back-bonding character [22][23][24][25][26]. On the other hand, N K-edge and O K-edge probe transitions from the N 1s level and O 1s levels into the valence, respectively, monitoring the unoccupied levels around the ligands [27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Fe L-edge probes transitions from the metal 2p core-orbitals into the valence. These transitions monitor the projection of the unoccupied levels around the metal, being highly sensitive to the 3d orbital occupation, as well as back-bonding character [22][23][24][25][26]. On the other hand, N K-edge and O K-edge probe transitions from the N 1s level and O 1s levels into the valence, respectively, monitoring the unoccupied levels around the ligands [27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These transitions monitor the projection of the unoccupied levels around the metal, being highly sensitive to the 3d orbital occupation, as well as the back-bonding character. [22][23][24][25][26] On the other hand, N K-edge and O K-edge probes transition from the N 1s level and O 1s level into the valence orbitals, respectively, monitoring the unoccupied levels around the ligands. 27,28 Thereby, we are able to track the changes in the electronic structure upon the replacement of a cyanide ligand with a water molecule with site-selectivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Already in the electronic ground state (green curves) we observe that the nearest solvation structure is different around the cyanides and around the bipyridine ligands, with a stronger interaction in the first case. This difference in solvation structure was also demonstrated by RDFs from classical MD simulations by Jay et al 38 Actually, such a ligand-dependent solvation structure was suggested by Toma et al 20 back in 1983, where a solvent such as water (high acceptor number) preferentially stabilizes the electronic (metal-centered) ground state of the metal complex by allowing for removal of electron density on the cyanide ligands and thereby increase the π-backbonding with the metal. These strong solute−solvent bonds formed between the cyanides and the nearest water molecules are expected to give rise to the observed strong solvatochromism (Section S3.13).…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Photoexcitation at the lowest-energy band populates MLCT states that decay on ultrafast time scales (≤200 fs) in water , but significantly slower (19 ± 2 ps, 17 ± 2 ps, or 16.5 ps) in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), according to optical and X-ray spectroscopy experiments. Recent soft X-ray absorption experiments reported a linear increase of the total L 2,3 absorption cross section as a function of solvent acceptor number, an effect hypothesized to arise from the solvent affecting metal–ligand bond covalency. That study was supplemented by simulated X-ray and UV–vis steady-state spectra in water, ethanol, and DMSO obtained via ground-state molecular dynamics (MD) computations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jay et al have used TR‐XAS at the Fe L‐edge and DFT calculations to investigate the underlying mechanism of [Fe(bpy)(CN) 4 ] 2− after photoexcitation. [ 41 ] Covalence effect of metal−ligand is found to even out charge separation after photo‐oxidation of the metal center in the MLCT state, which efficiently compensates for photoinduced charge variations in this process. [ 42 ] It is worth noting that some Fe II MLCT lifetimes with the picosecond domain have been explored by using strong electron‐donating ligands.…”
Section: Electronic and Structural Dynamics Of Light‐harvesting Unitmentioning
confidence: 99%