2005
DOI: 10.1021/bi0501582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing PrPSc Structure Using Chemical Cross-Linking and Mass Spectrometry:  Evidence of the Proximity of Gly90 Amino Termini in the PrP 27−30 Aggregate

Abstract: Elucidation of the structure of PrP Sc continues to be one of the most important and difficult challenges in prion research. This task, essential for gaining an understanding of the basis of prion infectivity, has been hampered by the insoluble, aggregated nature of this molecule. We used a combination of chemical cross-linking, proteolytic digestion, and mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF and nanoLC-ESI-QqTOF), in an attempt to gain structural information about PrP 27-30 purified from the brains of Syrian hamsters … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Res is provided in a study by Onisko et al (64) in which dimers and trimers cross-linked via Gly-90 with bis(sulfosuccinimidyl) suberate (BS 3 ) were observed. A stacked in-register alignment of the N terminus would space Gly-90 at ϳ4.8 or 9.6 Å between dimers or trimers, respectively.…”
Section: With Wild-type Prpmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Res is provided in a study by Onisko et al (64) in which dimers and trimers cross-linked via Gly-90 with bis(sulfosuccinimidyl) suberate (BS 3 ) were observed. A stacked in-register alignment of the N terminus would space Gly-90 at ϳ4.8 or 9.6 Å between dimers or trimers, respectively.…”
Section: With Wild-type Prpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such dimers and trimers would be susceptible to cross-linking by BS 3 , which has a maximum cross-linking distance of 11.4 Å. In contrast, four or more stacked monomers would be spaced at a distance greater than 14.4 Å and would therefore be outside the cross-linking range of BS 3 ; accordingly, no cross-linked tetramers were observed (64). Significantly, these findings would also be incompatible with some of the current models in which the axial spacing between the same residues on adjacent monomers would be greater than 14.4 Å.…”
Section: With Wild-type Prpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemical cross-linking experiments support this model. 119 A b-helix is however inconsistent with mass spectrometry and with H/D backbone amide exchange data obtained from fibrillar samples of the recombinant protein 120 which suggest that the sequence covering residues ~169-221 contributes to the core of the b-sheet, whereas residues 90-168 do not form H-bonded structures. A way to explain these differences is to assume that they arise from the different nature of the specimens used.…”
Section: What Does Structure Tell Us About Prp Function?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PK digestion of the 263K strain of PrP Sc cleaves the amino terminal domain to give an infectious core consisting primarily of 142 amino acids with an amino terminal Gly90 that is referred to as PrP 27-30 [2].Å IfÅ theÅ PKÅ digestionÅ ofÅ PrPÅ Sc is done in the presence of detergents, rod-shaped particles are obtained, composed of monomers of PrP 27-30. By use of chemical cross-linking and mass spectrometry, the amino terminal Gly90 residues of adjacent monomers in PrP 27-30 rods have been shown to be locatedÅ withinÅ 11Å ÅÅ ofÅ eachÅ otherÅ [11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%