1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9888(199610)31:10<1185::aid-jms396>3.0.co;2-q
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing Proline Effect in CID of Protonated Peptides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
163
1
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
13
163
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Preferential cleavage N-terminal to Pro in tryptic peptides has been noted previously [9,16]. Vaisar and Urban [27] have reported that singly-protonated pentapeptides with Pro in the central position show enhanced cleavage N-terminal to Pro (to produce y 3 ). They also reported that replacement of Pro with Sar in these peptides also resulted in enhanced cleavage to produce y 3 although not to the extent that Pro did.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Preferential cleavage N-terminal to Pro in tryptic peptides has been noted previously [9,16]. Vaisar and Urban [27] have reported that singly-protonated pentapeptides with Pro in the central position show enhanced cleavage N-terminal to Pro (to produce y 3 ). They also reported that replacement of Pro with Sar in these peptides also resulted in enhanced cleavage to produce y 3 although not to the extent that Pro did.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Cleavage of the amide bond N-terminal to a proline residue is a preferred pathway in CID fragmentation of peptides (the proline effect). [20,22] Additionally, loss of the two N-terminal residues from a peptide is one of the very common fragmentation pathways in CID. [23] Given these theories and observations, CID fragmentation of doubly protonated IgG1 T27 to form a single dominant y 15 2+ (PPVLDSDGSFFLYSK) product ion is not difficult to interpret.…”
Section: Specificity For Confirmation Of Etanerceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been noted in the literature that there is a strong preference for Pro to cleave at its N-terminal side, whether the product formed is the b ion or y ion. 30 Because b ions formed at most residues are accepted to have oxazolone structures (see Figure 1) [31][32][33] and because the b ion that would be formed at the C-terminal side of Pro would require a transition state involving formation of an unstable strained 5-5 bicyclic ring (see Figure 6), 6,8,34 cleavage typically occurs at the N-terminal side of Pro rather than the C-terminal side. This selective cleavage also provides information on the mechanism of the cleavage to form b and y ions.…”
Section: Nih-pa Author Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%