2014
DOI: 10.1021/la404925h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing of Polymer Surfaces in the Viscoelastic Regime

Abstract: In this Feature Article, we discussed the experimental and modeling methods and analyzed the limitations of the surface probing of nanomechanical properties of polymeric and biological materials in static and dynamic regimes with atomic force microscopy (AFM), which are widely utilized currently. To facilitate such measurements with minimized ambiguities, in this study we present a combined method to evaluate the viscoelastic properties of compliant polymeric materials. We collected force-distance data in the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
87
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
3
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Chyasnavichyus et al. (60) used a Johnson-modified Sneddon (55) approach in a combination with the standard linear solid model to describe the viscoelastic behavior of polymers. Because appropriate models to describe the situation of unloading correctly, i.e., where the contact radius decreases, are cumbersome and often require numerical solutions, most researchers use the method of Oliver and Pharr (61) that allows the evaluation of mechanical properties by concentrating on the earliest stages of the unloading curve, where the restoring material behavior is assumed to be purely elastic and the contact area not yet decreasing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Chyasnavichyus et al. (60) used a Johnson-modified Sneddon (55) approach in a combination with the standard linear solid model to describe the viscoelastic behavior of polymers. Because appropriate models to describe the situation of unloading correctly, i.e., where the contact radius decreases, are cumbersome and often require numerical solutions, most researchers use the method of Oliver and Pharr (61) that allows the evaluation of mechanical properties by concentrating on the earliest stages of the unloading curve, where the restoring material behavior is assumed to be purely elastic and the contact area not yet decreasing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The program performs a spectroscopy curve similar to the program provided with [22], except for the introduction of the 2D surface Young’s modulus for the description of in-plane surface forces, as described in the first section of the Results and Discussion above. The code is based on trimodal excitation of the cantilever, whose simulation has been described in previous publications [14,2223], and is thus not repeated here. The code uses constant-frequency, constant-amplitude excitation of the active eigenmodes, although other schemes or imaging modalities, such as scanning, can be implemented.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which was also reported by Lee and Radok. 15 Further Analytical Developments: Linear Load Assumption If the load history -during the contact of the cantilever tip with the sample -is assumed to grow linearly with a constant slope ( _ F Þ according to F t ð Þ5 _ F t, an assumption that may hold in some circumstances during the approach portion of a force spectroscopy experiment, 28,29 then eq 5 reduces to:…”
Section: Equation 3 Can Be Conveniently Laplace Transformedmentioning
confidence: 99%