2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevresearch.1.023013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing non-Hermitian skin effect and non-Bloch phase transitions

Abstract: In non-Hermitian crystals showing the non-Hermitian skin effect, ordinary Bloch band theory and Bloch topological invariants fail to correctly predict energy spectra, topological boundary states, and symmetry breaking phase transitions in systems with open boundaries. Recently, it has been shown that a correct description requires to extend Bloch band theory into complex plane. A still open question is whether non-Hermitian skin effect and non-Bloch symmetry-breaking phase transitions can be probed by real-spa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
183
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 332 publications
(202 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
5
183
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the feedback control interactions define distinct phases characterized by winding numbers which exhibit opposite behaviors for lattices with γ c = 0.1 and γ c = −0.1. These behaviors manifest as localized bulk Eigen modes in finite lattices, a phenomenon known as non-Hermitian skin-effect (NHSE) [65][66][67][68][69][70][71]. As an illustration, the Eigen frequencies of a finite lattice with N = 100 masses under free-free boundary conditions are displayed as black dots in figures 4(b) and (h), while representative Eigen modes marked by the blue circles are displayed in figures 4(c) and (i).…”
Section: Bulk Topology and Non-hermitian Skin Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, the feedback control interactions define distinct phases characterized by winding numbers which exhibit opposite behaviors for lattices with γ c = 0.1 and γ c = −0.1. These behaviors manifest as localized bulk Eigen modes in finite lattices, a phenomenon known as non-Hermitian skin-effect (NHSE) [65][66][67][68][69][70][71]. As an illustration, the Eigen frequencies of a finite lattice with N = 100 masses under free-free boundary conditions are displayed as black dots in figures 4(b) and (h), while representative Eigen modes marked by the blue circles are displayed in figures 4(c) and (i).…”
Section: Bulk Topology and Non-hermitian Skin Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further observations of a seemingly breakdown of the bulk-boundary correspondence principle [62,63] has led to proposals for a general classification of the topological phases of non-Hermitian systems [55,56,64]. A particular point of interest is the observation of the non-Hermitian skin effect [65][66][67][68][69][70][71], whereby all Eigen states of one-dimensional (1D) systems are localized at a boundary, in sharp contrast with the extend Bloch modes of Hermitian counterparts. This intriguing feature of non-Hermitian lattices has recently been experimentally demonstrated using topo electrical circuits [72] and quantum walks of single photons [73].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, no systematic understanding of the shape, location, and topology of non-Hermitian NKM surface state regions currently exists beyond isolated numerical results [24,28,29]. This conceptual gap has endured until today, because non-Hermiticity modifies the topological bulk-boundary correspondence in subtle complex-analytic ways, which so far have not been studied beyond 1D [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…* stefano.longhi@polimi.it tening near an exceptional point (EP) can be observed for non-Bloch bands, while ordinary Bloch bands remain dispersive [38,56,66]. As BOs and ZT in non-Hermitian lattices have been investigated in some recent works [69][70][71][72][73][74], the implications of non-Bloch band theory to particle Bloch dynamics remain obscure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of non-Bloch band collapse is shown in Fig.1 for a lattice model which is a variant of the Hamiltonian earlier introduced in Ref. [35] (see also [29,38,56]). The model corresponds to the following non-vanishing values of couplings [ Fig.1(a)]: ρ 0 = ∆, θ 0 = ϕ 0 = t 0 , θ 1 = t + δ, and ϕ −1 = t − δ, with ∆, t 0 , t and δ real showing skin effect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%